So this is confirming that you explicitly do not aim to just even be a little balanced about who you are criticizing and you would rather stay in lign with Russias narrative.
What weak and disrespectful arguments.
I never endorsed Russian attacks on Ukrainian civilian infrastructure here
But you never criticize it either. And all that while hammering out comments with critique about anything slightly opposed to Russias agenda.
None of the commentators who are trying to disregard your skepticism are known to be respectful.
(at least in politically related discussions)
And this is where trouble for Ukraine lies.
I think the Ukraine is not the only party in the war with logistical problems.
This meme is pretty inaccurate IMO.
First I think most Russians who are speaking like this would like to (and probably are) stay(ing) in Russia.
Second the EU is blocking most russians to enter it. Which is bad, as those who flee Russia mostly are not in favor of the Russian government. And I worry that closing the borders for Russians just strengthens the anti-russian sentiment in EU countries, while Russians (the people, not the government) are not fault of the current situation.
The SWIFT ban was specifically designed to not block any gas, oil or coal related trades between Russia and Europe, so that these can continue as the EU was very much aware that this kind of sanctions results into no benefit for them.
Europe did not refuse to buy gas from Russia. Russia just stopped selling gas to Europe.
No, they are neither state funded nor state controlled.
I guess most Germans know that not supporting the Ukraine from now on will not lead to lower gas prices suddenly. It’s to late for that I’d assume.
Germany does not have “a state media” besides DW (Deutsche Welle) which is very small and not worth talking about in the context of what you are implying.
Which the western media has openly discussed as an alternative route the whole time? From Ukraine per land to the Danube river and than to the sea.
Is this r/The_Donald
?
First of all: racism does not necessarily include fascism. That’s a little more in the extreme. Second this is about media being racist (which I agree is very bad and I was shocked about these reports as well in the beginning of the war)
Third, what does this Twitter thread has to do with NATO?
Pro NATO = fascism?
Relevant part
Introduce a “negative child benefit” tax for those who do not have offspring. This may seem unfair on those who can’t or won’t have children, but it recognises that we all rely on there being a next generation and that everyone should contribute to the cost of creating that generation. Use the funds to fix the UK’s broken, expensive early-years care system.
So it’s not about taxing childrens but taxing people without children. Not that I’m in favor of those talking points.
And you have a problem with them because of their agenda that they are calling out that you are posting stuff without any source / proof?