Before I start: I have not read Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism. I have the book, but I’m reading “Anarchism or Socialism?” By Stalin now to brush up on DialMat(every now an then I confuse Idealism and Metaphysics). I was wondering is this definition of Imperialism and the facts they use to back used in good faith and not just a “Yea they totally aren’t imperialist don’t worry” take on Russia? Sorry if that was worded weird, lmk thanks

  • crossy_grynch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    Russia is wannabe imperialist, but too weak to become real one.

    • Putin and some in his party may be (I don’t know if they’ve changed since they wanted to join NATO), but the government as a whole clearly isn’t. Their main exports are natural resources and commodities, not capital