• adrianmalacoda@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    People are going to complain no matter how they try to make money, but this should at least have been opt-in with clear consent. The alternative of course is being beholden to Google search referrals.

    Vivaldi, Brave, and their stans are getting their pitchforks ready, forgetting that they don’t have to do the hard work of developing an engine because Google already does that for them.

    • AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 years ago

      Vivaldi, Brave, and their stans are getting their pitchforks ready, forgetting that they don’t have to do the hard work of developing an engine because Google already does that for them.

      I don’t know about how Vivaldi works, but Brave stans can shut up. Their ad system is a hundred times worse than Mozilla’s.

      I mean, I don’t like how they went about this either, but considering the alternative of a 100% Google dominated browser space, and the fact that you can just disable it and the base Firefox code is still open source, it’s not a huge deal.

      • adrianmalacoda@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        Yeah, I’m not really defending them (from my point of view any feature that does something without my knowledge or consent being turned on by default is unacceptable) but from my point of view they’ll always have to dance with a devil of some sort. I say people are going to complain no matter what based on past experiences: e.g. the “sponsored content on new tab”, where they made sure to run all the “recommendation” logic locally so that no data was being sent out of the browser, that still wasn’t enough because “ads are bad.” So maybe from Mozilla’s point of view there is no incentive to try to make these folks happy. People complained whenever they tried to offer Pocket or the VPN thing or the password manager because those weren’t “core products” but they’re also not allowed to monetize the “core product” either. It’s like these people expect Mozilla to be able to synthesize money from air.

        I think I’m starting to come around to Drew DeVault’s position that it is impossible to implement the web as it exists today.

        • Evan@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 years ago

          I rarely use closed source software. My exceptions are

          • Windows
            • Because I need to run
              • Photoshop
          • DuckDuckGo (actually good FOSS search engine when?)
          • Vivaldi

          Vivaldi just works so wonderful. Once you use it you can’t go back (Check out the in browser mail client). I really wish they were FOSS though.

          • AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            Vivaldi just works so wonderful. Once you use it you can’t go back (Check out the in browser mail client). I really wish they were FOSS though.

            It doesn’t matter to me how much better Vivaldi works over Firefox or even Base Chromium. TBH, this is just something I’m willing to sacrifice in the name of FLOSS. iPhones and Macs are amazingly user friendly too, but I still avoid them like the plague because of Apple’s absolute hatred of FLOSS and especially Right to Repair.

            @TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml