For example, theming shouldnt have to be a 10 step process. Make Flatpaks use your themes correctly. Another thing is QT Theming, why is it outside of KDE you can’t use the breeze style? It’s the best and most consistent application style for QT apps. And the final point, when is the naming scheme of org.foo.bar going to be fixed to be the actual name of the package rather than the technical name. Flatpak remove and flatpak install both work without giving the full name, so why doesn’t flatpak run? The naming is the only thing snaps have over flatpak. If nothing is been done how can I contribute?

  • leanleft@lemmy.mlEnglish
    10·
    9 months ago

    better documentation eg: of cli commands would be an essential first step.

      • leanleft@lemmy.mlEnglish
        1·
        9 months ago

        https://docs.flatpak.org/en/latest/sandbox-permissions.html
        is a bit daunting. some context: im not personally complaining. im not even using linux right now.

        but back when i did uae flatpak… i found digging in to the internals to be something more aimed at experienced developers or package maintainers. and maybe thats not such a bad thing. but… modern linux systems are complicated when based on frameworks where things can break for obscure reasons.