See title. For those who don’t know, the Mandela Effect is a phenomenon where a large group of people remember something differently than how it occurred. It’s named after Nelson Mandela because a significant number of people remembered him dying in prison in the 1980s, even though he actually passed away in 2013.

I’m curious to hear about your personal experiences with this phenomenon. Have you ever remembered an event, fact, or detail that turned out to be different from reality? What was it and how did you react when you found out your memory didn’t align with the facts? Does it happen often?

  • ExLisper@linux.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I’m never sure if Castro is dead or not. I was sure for very long time that he died already but it would turn out that he’s still there. I also don’t remember any events specifically related to his death. His brother (?) took over and he kind of fizzled out before he died. Or maybe he’s still there? I’m never quite sure. I mean, it’s 2024 now, he’s definitely dead. Or is he?

    • NaN@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      He is since 2016, at least that’s what they want us to think.

      There were probably a few things that contributed to the confusion. Hugo Chavez was very friendly with Castro and he died of cancer, before Fidel. Fidel was also super old, and his brother Raul took a more prominent role a few years before his death, so there was less visibility.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 months ago

    I remember there was an AskLemmy question on the Mandela effect, but a week later we all realized it was just a dream.

  • Annoyed_🦀 🏅@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    When i got into monster hunter 4 ultimate(the one with a good story) i was told that Deviljho, a voracious monster that will eat anything mid combat to recover its stamina, will eat its own tail if you cut it. Everyone believed it, no one tried to capture it on camera because of the hardware limitation(no “clip that”, no shadowplay).

    Turn out, millions of Monster Hunter fans remembered wrong because it’s a hoax.

    • RampageDon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Ghost types are only weak to psychic in that game because they are poison types too. Ruined me for generations swearing psychic was super to ghost.

    • MimicJar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ve never heard that before and find it baffling.

      Bulbasaur comes out of the gate with two types.

      Charmander becomes Charizard with two types.

      The first (or second) non-starter you encounter is Pidgy with two types.

      The required Viridian Forest had Weedle with two types and if you only got a Caterpie, that becomes Butterfree who also has two types.

      The number of two type Pokemon that you can catch at the start of the game is massive. Probably about half?

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      I argued with my partner so hard about this.

      Then we looked it up.

      I was soooo wrong. And I was the one who got Blue and Red when they came out.

      • BertramDitore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Heh yup! That’s part of the effect, a whole generation potentially conflated Shaq’s movie with a movie that was never made. Scroll down the link I posted, they mention it. So bizarre.

      • BertramDitore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Lol I got into a pretty heated argument with a group of friends, half of whom definitely remembered the movie and even started recounting some of the plot. The other half had no idea what the hell we were talking about.

          • BertramDitore@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Oh I definitely remember seeing the movie. I even remember the VHS dust jacket on the shelves of Blockbuster. But who the hell knows lol

            • crusa187@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Dude yes!!! I remember that same jacket! Thanks for preserving my sanity for another day Bertram, hero.

  • xia@links.hackliberty.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    I get the “feeling” of a mandela effect far more frequently than i can solidly know for sure. I guess my first experience was decades ago as a child. I recall staring at a Bernstein bears book, and being oddly transfixed by tye fact that the spelling of the title did not match that of the authors name, literally inches apart on the same page. Later i experienced a schrodenbug or two (which i think is the same phenomenon), and one really solid social ME were a church ceased to exist (or got merged into a neighboring church). After the first few, now I fully admit I am WAY too quick to believe odd circumstance is a ME, and usually find myself reluctantly disproving that to myself with notebook/journal entries… only to later wonder how they might change too.

  • livus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    None but I live in New Zealand and have met a lot of strange people online who think our geographic location has changed.

  • Pastaguini [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    I could have sworn Signs was a legitimately good movie when I saw it as a kid but I rewatched it recently and it’s absurdly bad. The acting is terrible and the cinematography is nonsensical. Roger Ebert gave it a full four stars. I’m convinced there’s a universe I grew up in where it was good and it’s the same one Ebert is from.

    • NaN@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      M Night had the hand of Midas for a while and I think a lot of people were on the hype train. I also think the general audience has become more discerning, epic TV/streaming series mean a single movie needs to pack a punch.

    • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Eh. That’s just part of growing up. I’ve read the Shanarra chronicles 3 times: as a teen, a 20s, and 30s. Each time I noticed different things and interpreted events differently.

  • Owljfien@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    I could’ve sworn sprite didn’t have lime in it in Australia, yet I can find no evidence of it ever being made without lime

  • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    I just found out that you can’t take someone’s lead in order to behave like they are behaving, you can only follow their lead.

    I thought that taking someone’s lead, “I’m taking their lead”, is an actual expression, while apparently it is not.

    • twice_twotimes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      It may not be the original idiom, but it’s definitely something people say. If the core expressions are “(I) take the lead” and “(you) follow my lead,” that lends itself easily to a merge: you take my lead. It’s not as common as the originals but it’s definitely out there. It will stick around because it’s really easy to unambiguously infer what it means in context.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I agree that it’s used, I’m sure that if we looked in movie scripts or novels, we would find examples of that phrase, but I can’t find a single dictionary that agrees that the phrase is a legitimate phrase, and that’s what really boggled my mind.

        Boggled and boondoggled over here.

    • Mechanismatic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Taking someone’s lead sounds like a British saying indicating the opposite of following someone’s lead. It sounds like you’re taking someone’s leash in your hands and directing them where to go.

        • indun@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          “Take the lead” is certainly an expression used in the UK to denote guiding people, as in “I’ll take the lead”. I assume both come from ballroom dancing.

          I’m sure it’s used elsewhere but it may also simply be a conflation of the two.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah, taking the lead I think is a pretty common expression, meaning that you’ll take the initiative, but I’ve used " taking their lead" to mean that another person has taken the lead and someone else is following them.

            Which is apparently not real at all, but I only became aware of this because another Lemmy put up a TIL post that explained how they thought that was an expression and discovered after using it their entire life that it was not in any dictionary.

            Just like me

  • nycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    I had some Berenstain Bears books as a kid and I remember noting at the time “huh, weird name but okay”. So like, I don’t get why people think it was “Berenstein”? It looks wrong, but it’s always looked wrong.