• Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    124
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Student: “Hey, a shortcut! Let me first just walk around the long way so I can measure the length of the other two sides, multiply those lengths by themselves, add them together, and find out how much extra walking I’ve saved myself by taking the shortcut. Boy, this shortcut sure is saving me a lot of effort. Hooray Pythagoras!”

  • DanglingFury@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    There’s a college in Chicago, i think it’s IIT maybe, that used aerial photography to map out the student cow paths, then they redid all the sidewalks to incorporate those paths.

    Edit: they ended up adding a building in a grassy area and maintained all the hall/walkways of the building in line with the sidewalks/cowpaths. Kinda neat.

    • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      9 months ago

      This has happened at a LOT of colleges. Penn State’s quad is crisscrossed with paths that they paved.

    • Trollivier@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I love this type of urbanism. Some cities also study how cars behave in winter by looking at the tracks in the street, and they realized cars actually needed much less room on street corners than they thought.

      • uis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Every winter I see same corner filled with snow and nothing changed. They for sure need to cut some corners.

        • volvoxvsmarla @lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          9 months ago

          We had that in my local park. There was a huge field that everyone walked through because it was much quicker than going around. So they finally made a sidewalk there (not with tarmac though, more like gravel and sand mix). Just a couple of weeks later there was a new path just parallel to this one. My guess is the problem was that the field was a bit hole shaped (sorry I don’t know a better term in English) and this, as well just the nature of the sidewalk, led to it accumulating water puddles, and also it just turned into sandy/stoney mud when it rained. For bikes it was also just more comfortable to ride over the grass than over gravel. But it still felt like an asshole move.

            • Sabre363@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              Sadly this seems to be exactly their plan, just as soon as the government gives them another $10*10^6 to lose

  • CashewNut 🏴󠁢󠁥󠁧󠁿@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I wish I was taught about the usefulness of maths growing up. When I did A-level with differentition and integration I quickly forgot as I didn’t see a point in it.

    At about 35 someone mentioned diff and int are useful for loan repayment calculations, savings and mortgages.

    Blew my fucking mind cos those are useful!

    • thehatfox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      That’s one of the big problems with maths teaching in the UK, it’s almost actively hostile to giving any sort of context.

      When a subject is reduced to a chore done for its own sake it’s no wonder most students don’t develop a passion or interest in it.

    • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      9 months ago

      Hated Algebra in high school. Then years later got into programming. It’s all algebra. Variables, variables everywhere.

      • lhamil64@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        9 months ago

        Ehh I wouldn’t say variables in programming are all that similar to variables in algebra. In a programming language, variables typically are just a name for some data. Whereas in algebra, they are placeholders for unknown values.

        • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Machine Learning is basically a lot of linear algebra, which is mathematically equivalent to solving simultaneous equations.

    • onion@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      The other use is as a door-opener; Learning these maths fundamentals enables you to pursue a stem degree

      • CashewNut 🏴󠁢󠁥󠁧󠁿@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        as a door-opener

        You say that but they still need to teach you the “why”. For example I did A-level maths which was a door to learning discrete maths in uni. Matrices, graphs, etc.

        In 20yrs as a software dev I never used any of it. Only needed basic arithmetic.

        To this day I’ve got no bloody clue what the point of matrices are.

        • lobut@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          I used them in computer graphics and game programming. As a regular software dev, not so much.

        • onion@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          They’re used for manipulating vectors.
          Just like how in
          v
          the a makes the vector v longer or shorter, in
          v
          M can change the vector, for example rotate it.

          Just like vectors and other mathematical objects, matrices are purely theoretical concepts. There is no direct real-life meaning to them.
          However, there are a bunch of real-world problems where matrices can be put to use to calculate something meaningful.

          • I fucking loved maths mechanics which is like applied maths/physics. So you’d calculate the distance a ball is thrown or a cannon ball dropped from a cliff. Don’t think we ever did matrices in it though. I enjoyed it so much I’d do excersizes in the book for fun!! That and politics were the only courses I was passionate about.

            But I became a software dev that didn’t use maths or politics. :/

            So from age 5-17 I hated maths cos I saw no point in it. Until I hit 17 and someone said I can work out how fast a fucking cannon ball travels on impact?! I mean holy dog shit! If someone told me that in primary school I’d have loved maths!

            It was very much taught as a means to answer questions though rather than application. So as an adult I’d have to be shown how a number could be found using algebra. But because it wasn’t in an algebra question format it went over my head. It literally required someone taking numbers I’d been given and putting them in a line with letters before my brain engaged to “Oh shit - algebra! I know this!”.

            Another example is differentiation. I recently looked up my notes and remembered it was told to us very mechanically: f(x) = 4x^3 => f'(x) = 4(3x^2) = 12x^2

            No idea why that’s the case - it just is.

            It’s a shame cos I learnt I love maths at 17 but by that point I’d lost years of potential.

            P.S. any advice on where I can re-learn real-world maths? I’d love to redo my teens maths learning for fun.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I do some 8-bit coding and only last month realized logarithms allow dirt-cheap multiplication and division. I had never used them in a context where floating-point wasn’t readily available. Took a function I’d painstakingly optimized in 6502 assembly, requiring only two hundred cycles, and instantly replaced it with sixty cycles of sloppy C. More assembly got it down to about thirty-five… and more accurate than before. All from doing exp[ log[ n ] - log[ d ] ].

      Still pull my hair out doing anything with tangents. I understand it conceptually. I know how it goddamn well ought to work. But it is somehow the fiddliest goddamn thing to handle, despite being basically friggin’ linear for the first forty-five degrees. Which is why my code also now cheats by doing a (dirt cheap!) division and pretending that’s an octant angle.

    • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Beyond the general “hehe funny meme” Some seem to think there’s some kind of math going on in people’s heads other than “shortcut”

      The knowledge of Pythagoras or math doesn’t factor in here at all. Toddlers do this.

      Having the knowledge just gives you fancy words for the resulting coincidental shape.

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Having the knowledge just gives you fancy words for the resulting coincidental shape.

        Isn’t that basically all of physics? Just an abstract concept to describe something that sort of fits the rules we extrapolated from observations so far.

  • pflanzenregal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I think this is more a case of the triangle inequality in metric spaces, as you don’t have to calculate any particular edge to see the shortcut, as well as that it applies to any even non-rectangular triangle.

    • petersr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      But if you want to know your saving, you will need to dust off the old formula. And if you do, you find the maximum saving to be around 41% (in the case of isosceles right triangle where the hypotenuse is a factor of sqrt 2 shorter).

  • lseif@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    9 months ago

    all the student needs to know is c<a+b, not the actual formula or theory behind it

  • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Now, I’m wondering if we have a thriving Desire Paths (that’s what these paths are called) community somewhere on here.

  • KptnAutismus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    this is actually the one thing i am glad to have learned in math class. saves me a lot of guesswork sometimes.

    • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I can’t think of when I’ve actually used it.

      I’ve seen comments about how 3, 4, 5 allows you to make a square corner with a tape measure, but I’ve never had an opportunity to use that trick.

      I find myself trying to guess the area of things a lot more.

      • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I guess your not a carpenter and you don’t build things? It’s super useful. I don’t use it all that often but it’s an excellent tool to have. Even just laying out a square garden, say. It also works with any multiple to make bigger perpendiculars, 6, 8, 10 or 15, 20, 25