Endorse a reform-capitalist understanding of de facto Keynesian economics, increasing capitalist metrics of “prosperity”
Think I agree with a different school of bourgeois economics that supports measures opposed to Keynesianism
Think I view increased productivity and getting ahead in the competition between bourgeois economies and states as something worth pursuing and endorse measures meant to pursue those goals
I do not. I want a stateless, classless society, that meets the needs of and acts in favor of the proletariat, instead of creating new wants to be sold to give to the prole as a commodity. A society that would not destroy the planet through constant increases in productivity and output, perhaps? One where competition is recognized as a hinderance?
So you
Endorse a reform-capitalist understanding of de facto Keynesian economics, increasing capitalist metrics of “prosperity”
Think I agree with a different school of bourgeois economics that supports measures opposed to Keynesianism
Think I view increased productivity and getting ahead in the competition between bourgeois economies and states as something worth pursuing and endorse measures meant to pursue those goals
I do not. I want a stateless, classless society, that meets the needs of and acts in favor of the proletariat, instead of creating new wants to be sold to give to the prole as a commodity. A society that would not destroy the planet through constant increases in productivity and output, perhaps? One where competition is recognized as a hinderance?
Chill. By MF, I meant the economists in the west.