Can’t just be called India, can it.

  • ComradeChopinOP
    8·
    2 years ago

    I personally like “Union of Socialist South Asian Republics” or USSAR for short.

  • ☭CommieWolf☆
    71·
    2 years ago

    maybe: Democratic People’s Republic of South Asia (DPRSA)

    Syndicated Socialist Soviet States of South Asia? (SSSSSA)

    People’s Republics Of The Indian Subcontinent? (PROTIS)

    The Red Raj? /s

  • CritiGalDesist∞M
    51·
    2 years ago

    As far as I remember, “India” is the name the “west” gave to this region from the ancient greek times. Isn’t Bharat more appropriate?

      • ☭CommieWolf☆
        4·
        2 years ago

        It isn’t entirely, it depends on the language. Some languages say Bharat, others say Hindustan, and there are plenty who just call it India.

          • ☭CommieWolf☆
            31·
            2 years ago

            Its actually a lot more common than you’d think. I have actually heard Indians use Hindustan more often in casual conversation than Bharat.

    • ☭CommieWolf☆
      21·
      2 years ago

      I wouldn’t necessarily call it that. It opens up a whole can of worms about what you would consider a fair party to decide the name. The western name was India, yes.

      But Bharat is derived from the Hindustani name for the region, which might have the unintended side effect of giving preference to one group of languages over others. There are many other people groups and languages that don’t speak those dialects, such as the Dravidian languages, or the Indigenous people. Seeing as they are all supposed to be equal under the law, why should one language have legitimacy over the others?

      In a country as diverse as India you could say that the fairest thing would be to use a third party’s name.