based on #12680 but some reductions: some cases were already changed by vim/vim (just according to keikaku) focus on direct mention of the user which was the major concern.
I don’t think a single person would have cared if OP didn’t make this out to be sexist. It has nothing to do with male domination and it’s gross that you would assume that.
It has nothing to do with male domination and it’s gross that you would assume that.
Seeing how a lot of the documentation was worded to portray the user as a “he”, it’s at the very least unintentionally male centric, which is still problematic.
deleted by creator
I downvoted because it’s really unworthy of a post. It’s a grammar-level fix of the docs. It’s utterly insignificant. It does not deserve its own post
I don’t think a single person would have cared if OP didn’t make this out to be sexist. It has nothing to do with male domination and it’s gross that you would assume that.
deleted by creator
That sucks, do you have any idea how we could change that?
deleted by creator
That is true, hopefully we will get active communities for other topics as well in the future.
Seeing how a lot of the documentation was worded to portray the user as a “he”, it’s at the very least unintentionally male centric, which is still problematic.