based on #12680 but some reductions: some cases were already changed by vim/vim (just according to keikaku) focus on direct mention of the user which was the major concern.
It has nothing to do with male domination and it’s gross that you would assume that.
Seeing how a lot of the documentation was worded to portray the user as a “he”, it’s at the very least unintentionally male centric, which is still problematic.
Seeing how a lot of the documentation was worded to portray the user as a “he”, it’s at the very least unintentionally male centric, which is still problematic.