At this point I think you’re either an anti vegan bot/troll, an animal agriculture shill, or just someone so enraptured in the decision they’ve made
…because I’m accusing you of speaking incoherently? I don’t mean that in a vegan vs anti-vegan angle. I mean nobody is going to have a clue what you’re saying. It feels like the first time I tried to talk to someone in a country where nobody spoke English. If someone offered me $100 to explain what you’re saying, I would lose the $100 because I just don’t have a clue.
Instead of just insulting me, why don’t you try harder to explain what you mean?
…because I’m accusing you of speaking incoherently?
If that’s what you believe, that’s OK.
Instead of just insulting me, why don’t you try harder to explain what you mean?
Sorry if you feel I insulted you…? You’re trying to have a debate here, I’m not. That’s it. Get over it, move on with your life. Or keep me in your head rent free idm. If you can’t read between the lines, and see the bigger picture, there are future vegans that will see, and then act, as I did.
Whatever your goal, you either know what you’re doing, or don’t, isn’t my concern, and it’s apparant from the off that your anti vegan stance comes before anything worth responding to. That’s why my engagement with you is low. Others will see through it (intended or not).
If you need to feel the thrill of a win, here you go.
You’d actually make a brilliant case study on anti vegan rhetoric ngl.
That’s not “believe”. Nobody reading this even knows what the hell you’re saying other than that you’re (somehow) disagreeing with the non-vegan. I know this because enough people are following my discussions to argue with me that someone would have jumped in to rephrase your point and shove it down my throat by now if that weren’t the case.
Sorry if you feel I insulted you…?
You called me (and I quote) "either an anti vegan bot/troll, an animal agriculture shill, or just someone so enraptured " when I told you I that you weren’t making sense.
If you need to feel the thrill of a win, here you go.
No. I’d just like to know what the heck you’re talking about.
…because I’m accusing you of speaking incoherently? I don’t mean that in a vegan vs anti-vegan angle. I mean nobody is going to have a clue what you’re saying. It feels like the first time I tried to talk to someone in a country where nobody spoke English. If someone offered me $100 to explain what you’re saying, I would lose the $100 because I just don’t have a clue.
Instead of just insulting me, why don’t you try harder to explain what you mean?
If that’s what you believe, that’s OK.
Sorry if you feel I insulted you…? You’re trying to have a debate here, I’m not. That’s it. Get over it, move on with your life. Or keep me in your head rent free idm. If you can’t read between the lines, and see the bigger picture, there are future vegans that will see, and then act, as I did.
Whatever your goal, you either know what you’re doing, or don’t, isn’t my concern, and it’s apparant from the off that your anti vegan stance comes before anything worth responding to. That’s why my engagement with you is low. Others will see through it (intended or not).
If you need to feel the thrill of a win, here you go.
You’d actually make a brilliant case study on anti vegan rhetoric ngl.
Here’s my disengagement kiss. X
That’s not “believe”. Nobody reading this even knows what the hell you’re saying other than that you’re (somehow) disagreeing with the non-vegan. I know this because enough people are following my discussions to argue with me that someone would have jumped in to rephrase your point and shove it down my throat by now if that weren’t the case.
You called me (and I quote) "either an anti vegan bot/troll, an animal agriculture shill, or just someone so enraptured " when I told you I that you weren’t making sense.
No. I’d just like to know what the heck you’re talking about.
You’ll just never know. Others will. Move on. Be better X