• owenfromcanada@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    As someone who lives in the lower peninsula, I can tell you that Wisconsin hasn’t conquered the U.P. for the same reason no one conquers Russia. They can just retreat into the snow and let the wolves eat you.

    • FriendOfElphaba@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      I thought it’s because there is nothing there that anyone wants. I always thought Wisconsin was paying them to keep it. I can think of entire US states I’d be willing to pay France to take over.

      • owenfromcanada@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        It depends. If you’re into hiking, fishing, hunting, and snow, it’s a paradise. Lots of folks from the lower peninsula go there for vacations in the summer and fall.

    • quickhatch@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yooper here. Your example is on the money, but perhaps moreso than you know: The UP is also heavily populated by Finnish-Americans, which helps explain the cultural resilience and independence as well. The same dimensions that have kept Finland independent from Russia, keep the UP independent from others - and, holy wah, if I had a nickel every time we talked about breaking away from the trolls South of the bridge while at deer camp…

    • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is there even enough people in Wisconsin to pull of an invasion if the upper Michigan peninsula? How could they when there is only like 5 actual Wisconsinites there? Especially when they’re all trying to invent new cheese recipes?

      /s