• IzzyScissor@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    269
    ·
    1 year ago

    Remember, if someone asks you if you verbally agreed to 24k, you say NO. You verbally agreed to 42k and have the paperwork to match. There is no discrepancy.

    • pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      89
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly, accounts signed off on this, so clearly it’s not crazy. Who knows maybe they’re thinking “Wow I can’t believe we got this person for only 42”

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wouldn’t matter if they did. Unless you agree to the pay cut, you’re getting the written amount. If they insist it’s supposed to be 24k, stay quiet on it. Especially if they ask what you were offered. They can’t force you to tell them, and the right to silence is one of those that you get regardless of who you are or where you’re from.

    If they try to change your wage, or fire you for not accepting the correction, that would be breach of contract or at least wrongful termination at least… and that turns into a sizable settlement.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Generally you only have a right to silence in self incrimination, just answering if the agreement was 24 or 42 likely wouldn’t apply.

      • ItsMeSpez@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        What you really do here is play it dumb as hell. Oh, I’m being over-payed? Really? Wow.

        The key to keeping this up is not posting that you know about being over-payed and are doing nothing about it on the internet.

      • Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        In a court of law, for sure. But for discussion between an employee and boss, I don’t think that works the same way. I don’t think your boss would have the right to compel speech out of you like that.

        Unless it works differently in the UK?

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, nobody can force you to speak, that’s something you’ll have to do willingly. So IMO, the right to silence is one of the things that is universal to existence, regardless of law.

        • RealJoL@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, but in a civil case this may turn the favours against you. Even though you may not incriminate yourself, the judge may rule for the other party, as there is no burden of proof, but only of probability.

          Of course, a paper contract especially ruling 42k in black and white will be of more weight than a verbal contract.

  • lutesolo@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    As someone on the receiving end of this, it may not pan out for you. I was verbally told I was getting a raise, then my paychecks showed I got a larger raise. I thought nothing of it and enjoyed the extra money, thinking of myself as a hard worker who was worth the extra.

    Months later, someone noticed the discrepancy. Queue the company informing me that the overpayment will be taken in one lump sum from my next paycheck, which would have made me unable to make rent. I convinced them to spread the repayment across as many checks as they had overpaid, but that was a pretty miserable experience to say the least.

    • Norgur@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      93
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can’t really happen here, since the contract had the twisted numbers as well. So they have that amount in writing with signatures and all.

        • Swarfega@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, if you switch this around so it’s the business paying less then people here would be going irate if the business just said “well we are paying what the contract states”. I get it, people hate work. But that doesn’t mean you get to screw your employer.

          • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It says it right there in the contract. If you sign shit without reading it as the employer, and have been paying it for 9 months, that’s on you.

            It would be another thing if it was immediately fixed but in either case, be it the employee or employer, if you’ve been doing it 9 months then that’s on you. (If an employee had been getting underpaid - but still a legal amount - and didn’t say anything for 9 months, I also think that’s on them). Gotta read contracts folks.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You in America? If so, you got screwed and need to call your state labor board.

      At least in Florida, they cannot pull that shit. If they put it in your bank account, it’s yours. End. Think of all the scams people could pull if they could drop money in your account and then demand it back.

      SOURCE: Worked for a payroll firm. If we overpaid someone, or paid the wrong person/account, too damned bad, all we could do was ask nicely for it to be returned.

      CAVEAT: The bank can sure as hell pull your funds if it’s their mistake.

      • BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is likely state dependent. I’ve seen them pull back funds from people in MD. That was some years ago now though so that may not still be possible there.

          • Neve8028@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s legal in MA. I was paid double once and they took it back. I looked into it and sure enough, it’s totally legal as long as it’s within a certain timeframe.

          • BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I should clarify that it was legal in MD when they did it (this may no longer be the case). I had to talk to the company lawyer for guidance when it happened since I was part of the HR team at the time.

    • Serdan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      73
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m pretty sure that would have been illegal where I live. Paying someone the same amount each month is an implicit contract. You can’t just suddenly go “whoops” and not pay for a month.

      • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        Depends on what’s in the contract, black on white. If the contract says x amount and they pay you y (and you don’t speak up), they can get that money back as it was a bookkeeping error.

        If the contract says the higher amount then they can’t take it back, written contract always wins over verbal.

        • Pietson@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fair, but a contract can’t overrule actual laws. I’m not sure what exactly those are or where OP lives but if the law says he’d be entitled to that money then a contract couldn’t change anything.

          • marrenia@astraea.pink
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            1 year ago

            I would think it’s fairly obvious they are from the UK seeing as they are using the pound symbol for their money - and contracts for employment are king in the UK if I remember correctly

            • shalafi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Still, I can’t imagine a UK contract can override UK law. You couldn’t get someone to sign a contract saying they’re a slave and hold them to it. Contracts do not trump laws.

              • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Correct, contracts dont trump laws and your extreme example would not fly in court because of it and because it would break humantarian laws and rights agreed upon in our countries.

                That said, he speaks the truth. If a contract says you earn x and you earn x+20 euro, they can and will compensate for that 20 euro. Its perfectly legal and ive seen 2 euros go down from my pay because of book keeping errors. However, i assume the law has a margin for book keeping errors, and if not they can demand it back in court. You signed on it after all…

            • 520@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You do indeed remember correctly. This is a watertight case for the employee.

          • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s not how it works in both Germany and Austria. If you have a contract you get paid based on it, if there is a bookkeeping error you have to pay the money back if the company accidentally gives you too much.

            The only contracts that are invalid are when the number is very obviously wrong in the context. For example the contract says instead of $50k a year you get paid $500k a year or $5k a year, then the entire thing is void as it’s an obvious error.

            If the contract says $55k and the company wanted to pay you $45k… their problem, contract counts. Your boss might be pissed if you keep insisting on the $55k and might fire you, especially if you verbally agreed on $45k. But oh well, that’s another topic.

            Oh and in the UK? The employer is even allowed to deduct that money from your future wages. So much about knowing the law :)

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not where I live they can’t. See my other comment. If your employer gives you money, it’s yours, period.

          I see this idea a lot online. Guess either employees don’t understand their rights or the employers are equally ignorant, both VERY likely.

          And no, it’s unlikely the employer knows better and is fucking around. The magic words are “labor” and “board”, who will find in favor of the employee and throw a fucking to the employer. We handled payroll for quite a few shady employers, but none of them were dumb enough to play around with the money.

          • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That’s not how it works in both Germany and Austria. If you have a contract you get paid based on it, if there is a bookkeeping error you have to pay the money back if the company accidentally gives you too much.

            The only contracts that are invalid are when the number is very obviously wrong in the context. For example the contract says instead of $50k a year you get paid $500k a year or $5k a year, then the entire thing is void as it’s an obvious error.

            If the contract says $55k and the company wanted to pay you $45k… their problem, contract counts. Your boss might be pissed if you keep insisting on the $55k and might fire you, especially if you verbally agreed on $45k. But oh well, that’s another topic.

            Oh and in the UK? The employer is even allowed to deduct that money from your future wages. So much about knowing the law :)

              • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah… except for that tiny detail:

                There are three conditions that must be satisfied for the defence to be applicable:

                • You employer has made a statement of fact which made you believe that the money was your own;
                • You acted in good faith and without knowledge of any claim for recovery from your employer and as a result, changed your position in terms of the money; and
                • You were not involved in the cause of the overpayment.

                So if you signed a contract for a sum of x and the employer never said they are going to pay you more, you’re already acting in bad faith based on the first point. The second point is tough to argue, literally the only way to win this is if you have a verbal “contract” only and claim you never watched your bank account and just didn’t notice the extra money (but then if your employer tells you about the wrong payments you have an issue again…).

                In the real world you’ll probably pay the money back 99% of the time, except if you want to burn bridges and leave (going after you for smaller amounts is not worth the time in court). Your professional relationship will be ruined though, which you may or may not care about.

      • teruma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        In California at least, they’re allowed to ask, but I don’t think they’re allowed to require.

    • RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Meanwhile if they verbally promise you a raise and don’t give it to you there’s jack shit you can do because verbal agreements aren’t enforcable when it’s convenient for them.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which is sane. So anyway…

        Sorry, gotta go. That’s my employer calling to verbally offer me a raise.

        (Over here laughing imagining all the people suing because, “I swear he offered me a raise! Nah, for real!”)

        • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          In many countries verbal contracts can still be binding under certain circumstances. Just hard to prove, so yeah, get it in writing or it doesn’t mean much

  • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    As business barons are fond of saying, verbal agreements are only worth the paper they’re printed on.

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    In the event that they do require the employee to pay it all back, what I would have done was try to make the original wage work on the budget and stash the other £18k into low risk index funds to get some dividends and increased return. That way if paying it back were necessary, you’d at least make some money from the excess capital.

      • Gork@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        True. Legally binding contacts definitely supersede their vocal claims to the contrary.

        • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Thats the part where an employee should do what employers do all day every day like breathing: lie your ass off.

          “I recall the verbal agreement being for 42k, just as it is in the contract. Stop lying.”

          Probably should look for other work once the error found out though regardless of how you handle it. They’ll invent a reason to fire you for failing to be a good lil wage slave, cowering and signing an hr document obligating you to pay the difference back. A month later it will be some “not a team player” dismissal.

          Fortunately though, it might never be discovered. Corporate malice is matched only by corporate incompetence.