Not too different from Robin Williams

https://abcbirds.org/blog/truth-about-birds-and-glass-collisions/

I’d discuss options with the HOA, but you do you.

https://abcbirds.org/blog/truth-about-birds-and-glass-collisions/

Why would you say something so blatantly silly?

Are you implying that helping birds avoid windows is an unsolved problem?

It’s not going to be deleted.

I don’t think it’s misleading. Distinguishing between famines caused solely by external factors, and famines caused in part or in whole by policy, seems entirely reasonable. I was responding to your assertion that someone might misunderstand the meaning of “man-made”.

The biases of Wikipedia reflect the biases of its editors (there are Wikipedia articles about that). It could be a great tool for radicalization, but I suppose it’s easier to just complain about it.

why call it man-made then? sure you can argue that man-made doesn’t mean ‘deliberate’ but thats not how most people would interpret it. ‘famine’ is the clear neutral term.

If you only read the first paragraph and ignore the rest of the article you deserve to not understand anything.

where is mention of ‘man-made’ in Bengal Famine?

Feel free to add it. I’ll support the change

The article on Evolution has an entire section about the controversy, with links to dedicated articles about it.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

It’s man-made because the severity of the famine was undeniably affected by policy. I don’t think there’s anything biased about that. What it means, and the extent to which it was deliberate, if at all, should be expanded upon in the article proper.

The usage of “Holodomor” is so common that it’s perfectly reasonable for an encyclopedia to use it. It’s the article title most people are going to be looking for, after all. But it’s worth noting that the very first section (etymology) has a paragraph about how Holodomor is different from the Holocaust due to no evidence of intentional extermination.

Please stop forcing me to defend Wikipedia. 🥺

Btw,

Holodomor:

The Holodomor,[a] also known as the Great Ukrainian Famine,[b] was a man-made famine in Soviet Ukraine from 1932 to 1933 that killed millions of Ukrainians. The Holodomor was part of the wider Soviet famine of 1930–1933 which affected the major grain-producing areas of the Soviet Union.

Holocaust:

The Holocaust was the genocide of European Jews during World War II. Between 1941 and 1945, Nazi Germany and its collaborators systematically murdered some six million Jews across German-occupied Europe, around two-thirds of Europe’s Jewish population. The murders were carried out primarily through mass shootings and poison gas in extermination camps, chiefly Auschwitz-Birkenau, Treblinka, Belzec, Sobibor, and Chełmno in occupied Poland.

The opening paragraphs from the respective articles.

Spot the difference.

The article about the person is still up.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_process

Someone proposed deletion due to the subject not being notable. The next step is finding a consensus.

Currently it looks to me like the article gets to remain as is.

This is what I mean by not bothering to understand how it works.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Yaroslav_Hunka

The general sentiment seems to be heavily in favor of either keeping the article as is, or rewriting it to be about the event.

It’s interesting how Wikipedia is accused of bias from all sides, by people who can’t be bothered to figure out how it works.

Wtf. Would you please do something about that?

You have not at any point been earnest. If you had you wouldn’t need me to spell it out for you. Either that or you’re just so ignorant it’s offensive.

Riddle me this, dipshit: when did the genocide of Native Americans end?

Your answer to why I should waste my time seems to be that it would definitely be a waste of time.

What you’re not grasping is that I don’t owe you anything. I’m satisfied that you’re profoundly ignorant.

Lose the attitude and maybe I’ll humor you, but until then adios.

I support you in this endeavor.

Godspeed, comrade.

Going by OP’s name and post history… absolutely

No, it’s about demonstrating your ignorance of reality due to propaganda.

Besides, it’s obvious from your tone that you’re going to dismiss anything I say. Why should I waste my time on that?

I’m not driving anything. I’m just a dude commenting on a public forum. You’re being very silly. 🙄

When did I volunteer to educate you? That you can’t answer, and seemingly think the very notion is ridiculous, is exactly the point.

I have convictions that inform my opinions. I think it’s obvious that any decent person should hate USA, given their many, many crimes.

I guess you could characterize all communication as propaganda, but that seems rather pointless.