Remember that time he showed up in front of a woman employee, naked with an erect penis, and offered to buy her a horse if she would uh, help him out? And then he fired her when she refused? Pepperidge Farm remembers.
Of course he supports other men who do similar or worse types of things.
The horse thing is wild to me, because that’s not even a reward for a lot of people. Wow, I can have an expensive responsibility that I’m not equipped to care for if I touch your grody dick? Let me get right on not doing that. That’s just paying to touch Elon’s sad wang with extra steps.
Apparently the woman loved horses, so that was his go-to with her.
I’m not trying to excuse him, just explaining why that was his “offer” with this particular person.
Maybe one day we’ll learn what else he’s (allegedly) offered to others.
FTA:
while rubbing her leg, he reportedly offered to buy the attendant a horse if she would “do more.” (The story notes that the attendant rode horses.)
I hope I never find myself in trouble so bad that Elon supports me.
Is he trying to prove that there is no such thing as rock bottom?
He’s trying to test that “untouchable” status.
Musk see thing in news. Musk want part of it. Musk make noises so people see musk and talk about musk! strikes chest. Musk important!
Removed by mod
It is only a matter of time before enough people realizes that it is just his grifting business model.
Orchestrated outrage feeds clout goblins
Read how he physically and mentally abused his ex wife and you’ll entirely understand Elon’s stance on women as a whole.
Well I was reserving judgement until further details, but if Musk supports him, now I’m thinking Brand must be guilty
Musk trying to stay relevant by jumping on a controversial bandwagon. Nothing new. He’s an attention removed
Full-throated you say?
I don’t know for a fact if Russel Brand raped and assaulted women. It sure does look badly that he did. He still might be innocent, but I doubt it at this point
All of that is also irrelevant as it doesn’t matter what I think, what matters is what abudge and jury will think. Until then, saying shit like “I support Russel Brand, he’s innocent” just sounds really creepy andoke you’re prepping the world for when you get accused.
Musk has already been accused. He allegedly sexually harassed a flight attendant that worked for Tesla.
Predators gotta stick together. That’s why they all support the Gang of Predators.
Brand said in a statement that all of these were consensual relationships. Which uh, creates a problem when one of women making allegations was 16 at the time.
Just in case you wanted to know more about who Elon has tied his neck to this time.
The age of consent is 16 in the UK.
Full legal adult is still 18. It’s fucked up.
Sure, just pointing out that her being 16 is not the issue from a legal standpoint.
It is if you are talking about her ability to legally consent to sex.
For sure, but it’s still not helpful for his case. It’s one of those things where it’s legal but heavily frowned upon by people. That isn’t the first impression you want to give a jury of your peers, especially if you’re accused of sexually assaulting that 16 year old.
‘full legal adult’ is something a child would say. That is In your moral opinion, legally it’s irrelevant which is what the top comment was discussing.
Are you insinuating that if she was 2 years older than it’s totally okay? It’s the arbitrary number of her age vs another as opposed to the differences in their ages?
Such a bizarre concept.
It is very legally relevant that she was above the age of giving consent but not an adult in the eyes of the law. Which opens up a completely separate question of reduced age of consent laws even make any legal sense, but that’s a different discussion.
It would still be really fucking creepy if she was 18, but there’s certainly a difference. You’re right that it’s an arbitrary number, but that doesn’t change that we’ve arbitrarily decided that someone is a minor until they’re 18. An adult would understand that something being arbitrary does not make it irrelevant or something to dismiss.
Frankly, significant age differences are really fucking creepy. It still says something however if you’re a grown ass adult and you’re dating someone who’s a minor above the age of consent.
Read a couple of case law studies and watch some how tos on YouTube about whatever judicial system your country has and come back when you know what you’re talking about.
Best of luck.
LOOK AT ME!!!
“One of us! One of us!”
GOOBLE GOBBLE GOOBLE GOBBLE
OMG!! 🤣
Full throated backing is a fantastic turn of phrase. Will def be using that. And fuck elon.
Absolutely chilling if you watched the show.
It’s not a new idiom… you know that, right?
This type of shit appeals to the type of people that support the 0.1%
