• blargerer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Its a lot easier to support the UAW than the rail workers. Not because of the justice of the positions, but because rail workers striking paralyzes the entire country.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Biden could have forced the companies into more concessions. I mean, things like sickdays and having adequate coverage is just… good business…

        Or if the company refused to play ball, nationalized the companies under certain defende acts, instituted the reform (both in staffing, and safety compliance, and a few other areas,). But no. He elected to shaft labor- because the oligarchs couldn’t have that.

        • evatronic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          If you think breaking a strike sets a bad precedent, what do you think nationalizing an entire industry would do?

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            It’s been done before. it was wartime, last time. but it’s been done. do I think it’s a good idea? no. Do I think that the things the rail workers were asking for (and didn’t get.) were… reasonable…? absolutely. it would likely have been better for the business in the long term- albeit with lower short term profits.

            My point being… Biden could have gone to bat for the employees… and reformed the industry. if it’s so critical, while are we allowing idiots who fail to realize that they actually need to staff appropriate to the time constraints, rather than making their employees work shit loads of overtime and cut out safety checks?

        • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Biden could have forced the companies into more concessions.

          Genuinely, what further actions could he have taken that wouldn’t just be virtue signaling? It looks like he did successfully force the companies to capitulate several months later.

      • ImmortanStalin
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s the whole point. Solidarity is solidarity. They wouldn’t strike if the rail barons dropped even a pittance. It’s the 2020s but it might as well be the 1920s.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Not because of the justice of the positions

        Because that was never a concern.

        but because rail workers striking paralyzes the entire country.

        Sounds like the railroads are too consolidated then. The remedies should be breakup or nationalization. But strikebreaking is easier.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Id rather support rail workers, the UAW is a pretty shit tier union that’s far too large for it’s own good.

    • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The rail union got everything they asked for. The admin followed up. They just did a shit job of marketing it and the news doesn’t give a shit about feel-good news… just FUD click shit.

      And the administration will likely stay out of this.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I mean tbf he then gave them their demands, just without paralyzing the economy.

      Edit: Apparently he didn’t.

      Edit2: Apparently he did.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        no… he didn’t. the unions wanted paid sick days. Like. you know. pretty much every one except walmart and fast food workers. yes, only 4 unions were holding out, but all the unions wanted sick days. Also, keep in mind, the people in question are highly skilled with masters degrees. That’s part of the reason why it’s ‘hard’ to recruit for those positions- that and the absolutely batshit crazy working conditions.

        The things they were asking for would have been considered standard for almost any other sector at that level of skill… and really is just basic good-business-sense to give. But, like most stupid and greedy corps, they’re more worried about short term profits being hurt by the overhead of actually staffing adequately than they were about… employee health, the safety of their operations and literally everyone in the public nominally adjacent to their rail ways and yards. The paid sick days would barely even register on their quarterly reports.

        • snooggums@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          He could have used he situation to get laws passed that required minimum leave fornall workers at the national level, effectively giving the workers what they wanted instead of half asking it.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        They actually did get their sick days. Biden continued pressuring the railways after the media coverage was over and the railways gave the unions everything they wanted.