The hot pepper linked to teen’s death can cause arteries in the brain to spasm.

  • waz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    156
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Harris Wolobah’s cause of death is not yet determined; it’s not certain if the chip is to blame.

    Maybe, just maybe we should put our pitchforks away until we know if the chip mentioned is responsible?

    • Juvyn00b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you saying we shouldn’t put all our chips in one basket?

      Or not to count the chips before they hatch?

      • Kyle@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        1 year ago

        Common sense is waiting for an official diagnosis from a certified professional investigating the actual body for the cause of death.

        Not speculation from people on the internet that haven’t even seen the body.

        • Jerkface@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nah, mate. Knowing something you didn’t even bother to learn is the definition of common sense, which I made up myself.

      • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Uh, I mean, you can die at any one time without anything directly causing it. So no, it’s not necessarily common sense.

        And spicy foods, even very spicy ones, are consumed daily without too much medically bad happening… certainly not more than, say, eating peanuts.

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is it the chip’s fault if this turns out to be an allergic reaction or something like that?

        • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If such a reaction is remote, yet foreseeable to the manufacturer, the severity of the reaction (death) dictates a warning. It is a known, material risk, and the burden of warning is outweighedby the severity of the harm.

          There’s no warning on the package that it could result in death. The maker could be sued in products liability for negligent failure to warn.

          There was a good case in Mass. against Tylenol. One possible reaction of Tylenol is that your skin could melt and fall off (not even really exaggerating). Very remote possibility, but so, so severe. Manufacture knew it was possible, didn’t warn because it was so remote. But such a serious injury makes the risk material to a consumer, and so there’s a duty to warn.

          • 9point6@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            So I think this is the problem, the packaging says only for adults (these kids were obviously not adults), not for those sensitive to spicy food or with allergies to what I can assume are the main ingredients.

            I know disclaimers are a bit woolly as to what can stand up in court, but what more should they have put:

            • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Perhaps something like “this food may cause severe gastrointestinal distress or internal bleeding, which may contribute to pulmonary distress, which in some cases may lead to heart attack, stroke, or death.”