Fucking h*ck.

I love it when you talk birdy.

Oh, thanks! That’s gross, I’ll stay away from that.

Gross! where?

… And my fourth, and my fifth, and …

I have used the following justifications in proofs on math exams

“By hope, prayer”

“By some vague understanding of what’s going on”

The second one got 7/10.

Oh, right! She’s the pain you tasted, fell intoxicated!

So, you’re saying she’s a firestarter? Twisted firestarter?

I wanted a least squares solution, but all I got were these right triangles!

HYPNO BELLY ರ⁠_⁠ರ

Yes.

Do you know what classes you are going to be taking? If so, fnd the syllabus and take note of the topics and the text, if one is mentioned. See if you can find any mention of material your school may have used previously and get yourself a copy. Find the topics in the book and work through the exercises as you please.

Why do you ask so many questions? ಠ⁠_⁠ಠ

Sad or disappointed could still accurately describe reactions which are intended to be emotionally manipulative. It’s possible that this particular disambiguation could be complicated and may do more to obfuscate meaningful relationships in the data than reveal them.

Let x be any number. => x is a number. QED.

Copilot has cut my personal projects by about 40% freeing me up for work

Only the serial killers.

Yes! And the ambiguity means the DM doesn’t have to decide which it is until the players have deduced certain facts.

I feel like there might be interesting ways to deal with it. Perhaps the mass killing of neutrals only ever happened the first time, which could have been many generations ago and under singular circumstances. Since then, only the odd one here or there ever dies during the purge. Perhaps it’s been decades or centuries since anyone died to the purge, reinforcing belief in it’s effectiveness as a basis for a pure society. It may have been so long that people wonder whether the purge is even real, or just a traditional ceremony carried out annually based on old myths. Then one year, it wipes out half the city. The party investigates?

Schorsch makes no apologies for his business model, calling it “combination journalism.”

A combination of journalism and not journalism?

"I don’t think I’ve ever held myself up as a journalist.

So JUST not journalism.

“I publish the work of other journalists,” Schorsch says.

Journalism, then.

“We’re setting new rules,” Schorsch says. “We’re very much a niche property that attracts advertising and sponsorship and partnership arrangements with people with whom we interact with, if not cover.”

…Not journalism.