The use of depleted uranium munitions has been fiercely debated, with opponents like the International Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons saying there are dangerous health risks from ingesting or inhaling depleted uranium dust, including cancers and birth defects.

  • flipht@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not about them. It’s the children who find the spent ammo later.

    This crap is the reason that there are birth defects spikes anywhere the US military operates.

    • kitonthenet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ok but the alternatives are not environmentally conscious either, finally the people who’s land it is should be the ones making choices about the conditions of that land

      • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The alternative bring tungsten? It’s very stable so anything besides eating a spent rod isn’t going to have effects. If it’s in the air it’ll just be inert. Even if it gets in your lungs it’ll be like any other dust. DU on the other hand would keep emitting radiation internally.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s a really convenient narrative based on the fallacy of homogenizing Ukraine. Let’s take a look at a few slides from this lecture that Mearsheimer gave back in 2015 to get a bit of background on the subject. Mearsheimer is certainly not pro Russian in any sense, and a proponent of US global hegemony. First, here’s the demographic breakdown of Ukraine:

            here’s how the election in 2004 went:

            this is the 2010 election:

            As we can clearly see from the voting patterns in both elections, the country is divided exactly across the current line of conflict. Furthermore, a survey conducted in 2015 further shows that there is a sharp division between people of eastern and western Ukraine on which economic bloc they would rather belong to:

            Maybe learn a bit about the subject first.

        • FireMyth@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lol the people of ukraine are fighting against a war of aggression from Russia. That’s it.

      • Square Singer@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        But which people? Government or the people who actually own the land?

        And I guess, their favourite choice of “Don’t use any weapons on my land and just clear off voluntairily” is not an option.

        I don’t get why people hate on the Ukraine for using weapons to defend themselves. Not like they chose to be attacked.

    • yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is ammo made from lead that much better? I honestly don’t know. Sure the radiation sucks but Uranium, at least the isotope they’re sending is “barely” radioactive. It’s the same Uranium people had in their plates etc. The toxicity is probably the far more relevant factor but I don’t know how Uranium compares to lead.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Depleted uranium is not really that radioactive. Everything is technically radioactive eventually though. Depleted uranium is what’s left behind when you seperate the radioactive stuff out. It’s a heavy metal still, so isn’t good for you, but heavy metals will always be involved. Trying to have a war using only healthy, organic, ethically sourced munitions isn’t going to happen.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This makes sense.

      I imagine there’s a lot more reasons for birth defect spikes post US mil ops in addition to this. The military isn’t exactly an environmentally conscious operation. ☠️

      • flipht@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, burn pits and other crap will help.

        But this kind of ammo, kids will find and hang on to. They bring it home, add it to their collection of other cool shit they’ve scavenged…and then their brothers and sisters are born with malformed limbs, mishaped heads, etc.

        There have been a lot of stories written about it over the years. The one I read was specifically about Iraq I believe, but it was a while ago.

    • cooljacob204@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The amount of Ukrainians dying right now will pale in comparison to those effected by the munitions.

      The controversy around depleted uranium rounds is way overblown.

      Even in Iraq the evidence is super inconclusive. And yes birth defects rose however the entire country basically collapsed for years and nothing clearly indicates it was the DU used.

      Don’t get me wrong, it’s nasty stuff. But this is war, more people are getting killed by bombs then any DU related cancer can cause.

    • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      We have to remember that Russia caused this war, however. So they also caused the depleted uranium being a possible health risk for future ukrainian children.