• whileloop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    284
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is your hourly reminder that Brave is still Chromium and still contributes to Google’s influence over internet standards.

    • amnesiacrobat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      160
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Iirc Firefox and I think Safari are the only major non-chromium browsers. It makes me so sad because I remember Google’s “don’t be evil” days… man they left that behind

      • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        1 year ago

        Safari already has attestation, has for a while, so while its at least a different browser, it’s still part of the problem.

            • SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah. They selectively adopt web standards years later than the others and the mobile and iPad versions in some ways behave completely differently from desktop (and each other). If safari just acted like the other browsers, frontend web dev would be MUCH easier.

              • SpeziSuchtel@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Depends on which standards, for some css functions like backdrop-filters and mix-blend-modes it was years ahead of Firefox, where some of those had to be activated through about:config. I‘m glad Firefox catchend up in the past few years though. Also WebKit accelerated HTML5 adoption a lot.

                Never had any major issues developing for Firefox, safari and chrome in the past few years though. It was quite a different story 10 years ago but nowadays 99% of the time, it works flawlessly between all major browsers for me.

                • SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I feel like you’re referring to Firefox literally 12 years ago or more. I’m talking about today. Literally any brand new standard is not supported for 1-2 years minimum. I run into problems with safari on a near daily basis. I rarely have a weird issue in Firefox. 99% of the time chrome and Firefox behave the same. The vast majority of the time that one browser has an issue others don’t, it’s safari. It’s weird to me to get pushback on this …

      • TheAlbacor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks for pointing this out! I was already using Firefox, but after looking this up I found out that they also got rid of him for being homophobic.

        Firefox it is!

      • Fest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        i always use software for what it is, ignoring the beliefs of its creator, but ive already been using firefox, librewolf and mullvad browser since i moved to linux, and i have only been seeing people say stuff that shows chromium is worse. (except for people with no argument of course)

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Librewolf has been pretty cool since I started using it as a sidearm with less than 600 ff tabs, how does mullvad compare?

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Librewolf has been pretty cool since I started using it as a sidearm with less than 600 ff tabs, how does mullvad compare?

    • Hobbes@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The CEO also donated to Prop 8 in California and a number of other bigoted conservative things.

    • Smokeydope@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is your hourly reminder that default Firefox isn’t that great for privacy thus librewolf exist

    • Engywuck@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cool. If me choosing Brave over FF contributes to the demise of the useless, cash-grab scam which Mozilla is, I’ll happily continue using Brave.

  • Hobbes@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I just switched yesterday after learning more about why I should here in Lemmy.

    The last time I tried FF (many years ago) it was incredibly slow, so I went with chrome. But the FF of today is actually noticably quicker.

    Also, FF offered to import all of my bookmarks, autofills, passwords, history, and even my extensions (if a FF version exists of course, almost all of which did) and did so seamlessly. It was the easiest software switch ever.

    • maaj@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah being able to import all my stuff from chrome to Firefox was so clutch, now I just have to find a good day to spend getting the rest of my shit out of google’s hands and get this pixel phone to run grapheneOS.

      • figaro@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        Privacy and not being part of Google would be the biggest reason.

        It also looks kinda nice, in my opinion.

        It’s also faster than chrome now I think.

        • godless@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s also faster than chrome now I think.

          Resource management is much better. Chrome will max out the RAM, which slows down the browser. Firefox handles that 100x better.

      • shrugal@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Apart from privacy concerns, Google has started to add some really bad features to Chrome, such as “Manifest V3” and “Web Environment Integrity”. These limit your ability to block ads or generally modify your device or the websites you’re visiting, and are just a bad for the web as a whole. WEI in particular is basically DRM for the web, so Google checks your device and denies you access to websites if they don’t like it. But as long as the majority of people keep using Chrome they can just force these things onto everyone.

    • 😈MedicPig🐷BabySaver😈@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      My friggin’ Chromebook (which works great) can’t install FF.

      I’ve tried rooting into Ubuntu, but, I can’t get it all straightened out. Until I notice truly diminished issues… I’ll use Chromebook as is.

      • Alex@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not even as an Android app? I’ve run Firefox from crostini as well but the Android approach is a lot easier.

    • Hangglide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      1 year ago

      I tried FF earlier this year. It sucked. Everything just took extra clicks. The password manager was a pain and didn’t interact with my phone apps properly.

      I know the complaints against chrome. When it starts forcing me to watch ads I might try FF again.

      • pipes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hey, at least installing a foss browser won’t slow down your phone like a spyware app, you could always try something like Mull even for only a portion of your browsing if you have ~80MB to spare. I suggest it because I hate some of that extra bullshit that comes with standard Firefox. Also there’s tons of projects that try similar stuff with Chromium! Like Mulch. Way better defaults than Chrome

      • rambaroo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Android FF is not a great user experience for sure. On desktop it’s just fine but Android is janky. I tolerate anyway to support Firefox but chrome is miles better on mobile.

    • mishimaenjoyer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      same problem we had back in the ie5/6 days: it was just there and most people don’t care. i physically cringe when i watch co-workers using chrome with not even a basic adblocker installed, klicking away ads, promts, pop-ups, videos and whatnot just to access a news article. it’s horrible!

        • tool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m forced to use either Chrome or Edge for my work computer and it drives me crazy.

          I’ve been a Sysadmin for a ~decade. I can state with 100% certainty that the reason behind that decision is that you can very easily configure Group Policy to control the behavior and visibility/availability of features in Chrome and Edge. Firefox didn’t have that until just a couple of years ago, and it wasn’t great when it first became available. And to be honest, it’s still not fully baked, but it’s at least usable now from an administrative perspective.

          Maybe bring it up to your IT department and include this link in the email/ticket.

    • danielton@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      People switched because “it’s the fastest” but that hasn’t been my experience with it at all. Sure, it LOOKS more minimalistic than Firefox, but it’s a RAM and CPU hog that litters my computer with Google trash.

      People still download it because “it’s the fastest”

    • Potato_in_my_anus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I’ve been using Firefox exclusively for ages. And also Duckduckgo, I just can’t stand the excessive of Google’s captcha since I always use VPN.

    • ObservantOcelot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’d use it exclusively, but there’s no Ad Blocker for it on iOS, and I don’t want to run an ad blocking VPN all the time. I also don’t like how there’s no official PWA support on desktop.

      • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Chrome doesn’t support extensions at all on iOS, only Safari does - because of Apple. Firefox would absolutely support extensions and use Gecko on Ios if Apple let them.

        • ObservantOcelot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, but there are ways other browsers have determined how to have in-built ad blocking. I’m not sure of the ins and outs, but Brave, Samsung Browser, and Edge all have built-in ad blocking on iOS.

      • Reygle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The heck? UBlock works on Mac- ohhh is this an M1/M2 thing I was unaware of?

        Nevermind, you said IOS not MacOS

      • mrvictory1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        But there is strict tracking protection which acts like a slightly degraded ad blocker. It has blocked everything except YouTube ads and “you have ad blocker enabled” pop ups for me.

  • DireDazzle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    1 year ago

    Showing people that they can avoid ads by switching from chromium might make more people use adblockers.

    I get flabbergasted whenever I talk to someone and realize they’re unaware that such things exist. I hope all (according to the google store entry for ublock origin) 10,000,000 of the ublock origin users switches from chromium based browsers to, say, firefox…

    Feels like chromium is the new internet explorer…

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s why Google is trying to launch the “Web Integrity API” that will essentially allow them to mandate any website accessible to or using Google Services to ban browsers that have ad blockers.

    • dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know a lot of Chrome users, and the general story I get from them is nearly always the same infuriating bullshit along these lines:

      “So, I tried the like, Fox Fire thingy, but this one time, like, it took, like, 1.5 seconds to load, so it’s “””“”“”““slow””“”“”“”" so I just use Chrome 'cause it’s, like, faster and stuff."

      Yeah, and I suppose the 427 useless things you have running in your system tray right now don’t have anything to do with your computer being “slow,” right?

      • tenochtitlan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is also the initial load problem where it would take longer to load in Firefox compared to chrome. Yet people will attribute it to the browser and not the fact that assets were already stored in chrome.

      • PastThePixels@lemmy.potatoe.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or worse, “Why should I switch to Firefox? Everybody’s complaining about the performance of Firefox compared to Chrome, but Chrome just works for me.”

        Blissfully unaware of the kind of power you’re giving Google over the Internet by using their browser. I once had an experience where someone tried to use this to push me back to using Chrome.

    • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      To me it looks like a tech savy kind of hurdle, once people learn about it and start thinkering they start to use it also.

      Better for us when people start caring for what they tolerate from corps.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You wish that was happening.

    I’m preparing to be completely unsurprised that Firefox’s market share will still be at 3% next month and the month after that.

    • propaganja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If that 3% is made up of an outsized share of power users they might be ok. I’m more worried about the power structure shenanigans that have been going on the past few years.

    • Deebster@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I alway wonder how underreported the Firefox figures are by things like that its users are generally more technical/privacy aware (so are blocking the trackers that report these numbers) and also spiders and bots often pretend to to Chrome (inflating those numbers).

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I had to choose between a tracked, ad-filled experience and a slower, protected experience, I would go back to 1990s style Internet in a second.

    • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Slower? I think browsers are all pretty much on par these days.

      The killer feature Firefox needs to implement is profile switching.

      • Bilb!@lem.monster
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You may know this, but Firefox does support multiple profiles. I regularly open it with firefox -p "PROFILENAME" depending on whether I’m working or not. you can go to about:profiles to manage the different profiles.

        • Scratch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I find Containers to be very clunky to use. I love the idea, but not being able to just send a tab, cookies, session and everything to a Container is a PITA.

          • arglebargle@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            How would that work though? If you start outside a container how can you decide what to isolate to put into one?

  • ivanafterall@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    A few years back when Firefox went through the whole “Quantum” update, I jumped and never looked back. It’s just better in every way, in my opinion.

  • egeres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s the advantage for google of doing this move? People “savy” enough to install an adblock (or even know that it exists) is most likely to switch to a competitor that allows for adblocking

    • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Majority will keep using, for a while, until years later more see what has happened and move.

      Mean while profits on marketing go up.

      • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Google has gone to absolute shit. Unless you let them stick their hand down your pants and fondle you, you can’t even use their search engine with out getting hit with a captcha so they can use browser fingerprinting to track you. We were all hearded into the slaughter house and they are just now starting up the kill machines.

      • egeres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Mhm, I see that point, although I find it concerning given that the quality of the UX platforms like youtube has kept a consistent decline over the past decade. It feels like google keeps amassing more and more reasons for people to enable adblockers but I also understand youtube needs to be a profitable business and at some point you need to show ads

        • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          True, these are the challenges of freeware, ads are required unless you pay or become a pirate.

          Youtubers/social media now mostly have promotions within videos, so we went back to how cable functions.

          Thoughts on Social media/Rumble/twitter and other video platforms will evolve over time?

          I think Alphabet (Google) will keep doing things that make people leave there other platforms, youtube will take a while so changes will be more gradual.

          • egeres@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            As a small note, in an unexpected turn of events, that “sponsor block” extension popped up also blocking promotions, I find it incredibly amazing that blocking ads can even go that further

            I can’t put my finger on it, but somehow I feel like youtube is irreplaceable, I don’t say this out of some internet patriotism, I just think the initial momentum of inertia really has to be massive to make it budge, while with fediverse-stuff you can gradually generate content and maybe some people will be attracted (?)

            And twitter’s trajectory is to fucking weird and unpredictable right now that I just have no clue 🙃🙃🙃

            • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Awesome, I did not know blocking sponsers was a thing, wow.

              Yes, you are right, youtube will be harder to leave for people, but Tiktok/twitter/etc. are grabbing the attention away from yt.

              They all are trying to keep you on their platform as much as possible, for ads and data collection.

              The new big thing may be bettet at that…?

              Thanks for your input!

              • egeres@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Oh yes, you’re right, tiktok is really eating youtube’s meal… and about the new big thing, hums, I’m not sure how it would look like 🤔

                Thank you for your input as well!! 🙌🏻✨

                • jigsaw250@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  TikTok is definitely hitting for certain demographics, but YouTube is still king in the long form department and I don’t see that changing unless they completely alienate their watchers and creators or someone comes along and offers significantly more money (to creators).

      • sfgifz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It won’t be a change no one notices though. Even non-savvy people who use ad-blockers are obviously going to notice that the internet suddenly became a significantly terrible experience.

    • suspecm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      The way things are going with data collection and advertising, the EU is bound to put heavy restrictions on it, basically killing the market Google is built on. They are trying to find a middle ground between banning data collection and full on everything being collected you do online, and if ad blockers just happen to die in the crossfire, it’s not Google’s concern.

    • Scratch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I believe it’s a two-pronged attack.

      They have the Trust API changes they are trying to push, which I believe they may try to make websites only support browsers using that API. They have a largest user base already so they have some sway, if Chrome won’t load your webpage, you business might be dead.

      Couple that with their anti ad blocking extension, users have to use Chrome to access webpages and can’t block ads on those pages.

      Mildly tinfoil-hatty, but I think within the realm of possibility.

  • gi1242@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think firefox should ship with ublock origin installed. (Perhaps also containers).

    Hopefully then more people will migrate faster

    • mrvictory1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      At least tracking protection should be set to strict, iirc on default setting it barely blocks any ads.

      • PrefersAwkward@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Strict tracking protection makes Firefox on Android a ton faster, especially on any website owned by Google or any link that has a Google wrapper (e.g. clicking a link on the Gmail app)

        • mrvictory1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Strict protection on iOS was literally the difference between “I can use this phone” and “brick”. I had an old iPhone, 6 Plus, and Safari lagged to death because it tried to load ads. Firefox didn’t.

            • PrefersAwkward@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              To add to this, I have uBO installed on FF Android, but Strict Protection still makes things much faster for me. I’m not sure if it’s because of my other Addons, but FF Android is so slow otherwise with certain sites (mostly just Google’s)

  • mrvictory1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a user of Linux and primarily FOSS software for 2 years, each time I recommended something FOSS, others had bad luck.

    • I tried switching someone to Linux but I couldn’t achive %100 funnctionality on a Windows only app I set up via Wine. (it is an obscure program, not sth like Adobe or MS Office)
    • I recommended Kdenlive to a Mac user friend, he couldn’t export a video he spent 30 hours on it.
    • I convinced someone to use Libreoffice but they lost data in only 30 mins because I forgot to tell that if you draw more than a few strokes in LO Draw it enters a save loop. This is fixed now thankfully.
    • I recommended VLC for DVD ripping, it entered some sort of loop and failed to export.

    Each of the above examples involve completely different people, by the way.

    • I set up 2 fresh Windows installs for family but installed Firefox with strict protection and uBlock Origin instead of Chrome and… it worked?! They still use Firefox. Maybe the alpenglow theme is too good, I don’t know.
    • RivenRise@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re right and it’s that sort of stuff that people like you and me will deal with and figure out and move on but unfortunately it’s not the case with regular people. That’s why I never recommend that sorry if stuff to ‘normies’ ie. My mom. Instead I set them up with the lesser of evils that will give them convenience and make them more likely to trust me in the future. That way, if I ever REALLY need them to move on from something they will be more likely to just listen to me and not fight me about it. I just got a couple of friends to switch over to Firefox even though they were chrome fans, all because I have years of goodwill. Ported their bookmarks and got them ublock and they barely even notice a difference.

      • persolb@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think this is true for everything… we just notice it when we’re the ones ahead.

        Some people can’t change tires, some can’t cook, some can do basic plumbing, some can’t remove appendixes, some can’t swim… whatever.

        Granted, I think the main divide were all on the good side of is “some people know how to search, some people don’t”

  • desto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    In the old days I used Firefox exclusively, until my work started only supporting chrome so I kinda went with it and switched. Out of habit I continued until a couple of years ago, that I went full Firefox again and I remembered why I loved it.

  • notenoughbutter@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    people when they learn about unlock origin works better with firefox

    I bet most people saying chrome is faster don’t even know about adblockers or are using Google’s websites

    • Mellibird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      When I made the switch I was shocked at well it blocks ads. It still surprises me to this day. Yeah, it takes a little longer to load, but I couldn’t care less.