• MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Perhaps, but the prevalence of single family homes is a huge problem itself. They generally bring in less in tax dollars than they cost the city to maintain, since it’s more road, sidewalk, sewer, etc. for one household. My tax dollars as someone who lives in a multifamily building subsidize others in my city who have one household on much larger properties. I don’t want these people to have more tax breaks and incentivize more of that to be built.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      This is a huge problem with suburban devlopments (single family homes, strip malls, box stores). Almost all of them rely on denser parts of the cities to maintain themselves. Unlike the denser parts of cities, the commercial zoning often struggles when the original business leaves, unlike denser areas that are more flexible. Not only do these developments cost more to build and maintain, they often don’t provide for as long and can be costly/resistant to redevelpment due to suburban zoning and NIMBYism.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      My tax dollars for a single family home are far above that paid for a tiny apartment, and that’s as it should be