I’d argue it made sense in most sectors, but I disagree that tech dealing with national security tech needed to be implemented on western platforms. After all, people managed to do security before this tech was available. It would’ve been better to simply do things the old way until domestic options were available.
I’m a little confused by what you mean by the “old way”. There is no old way, digital infrastructure is constantly evolving as are threat actors, you can’t use older products and expect them to work nor is there even an older way oftentimes. The national security risk also isn’t for nuclear weapons or CPC internal communiques, it’s for hospitals, smaller firms, individual websites, and so on. Technically anything can be classified as “national security”.
If by old you mean analog? Then that’s not feasible, an analog system would be insanely impractical and cost ineffective. You can’t run a digital economy on an analog system.
China also needed to parlay with foreign firms for sales, development, and so on, they couldn’t just say “Hey wait, we don’t have any digital infrastructure”.
I guess the question is what specific cybersecurity software we’re talking about and where it’s being used. I agree regarding the civilian sector, it makes sense to use things like western anti virus software in these cases. That said, China’s had parity in skills here for at least a decade. So, they definitely let things slide until the actual confrontation started with the US being openly hostile now.
I’d argue it made sense in most sectors, but I disagree that tech dealing with national security tech needed to be implemented on western platforms. After all, people managed to do security before this tech was available. It would’ve been better to simply do things the old way until domestic options were available.
I’m a little confused by what you mean by the “old way”. There is no old way, digital infrastructure is constantly evolving as are threat actors, you can’t use older products and expect them to work nor is there even an older way oftentimes. The national security risk also isn’t for nuclear weapons or CPC internal communiques, it’s for hospitals, smaller firms, individual websites, and so on. Technically anything can be classified as “national security”.
If by old you mean analog? Then that’s not feasible, an analog system would be insanely impractical and cost ineffective. You can’t run a digital economy on an analog system.
China also needed to parlay with foreign firms for sales, development, and so on, they couldn’t just say “Hey wait, we don’t have any digital infrastructure”.
I guess the question is what specific cybersecurity software we’re talking about and where it’s being used. I agree regarding the civilian sector, it makes sense to use things like western anti virus software in these cases. That said, China’s had parity in skills here for at least a decade. So, they definitely let things slide until the actual confrontation started with the US being openly hostile now.