wsj.com
www.wsj.com

The Wall Street Journal warns that the investigation into the Nord Stream pipeline explosions “threatens to fracture support for Ukraine.”

German investigators reportedly believe Kiev was behind the sabotage, specifically pointing to former Ukrainian commander-in-chief Valery Zaluzhny.

According to WSJ sources, an elite Ukrainian military unit carried out the attacks under Zaluzhny’s direct supervision, aiming to deprive Russia of energy revenues and weaken its economic ties with Germany.

The article recalls that suspects have already been detained across Europe and warns of serious fallout if a German trial against Ukrainian nationals begins. Such proceedings could further strain relations with Germany which is Ukraine’s top financial donor and key arms supplier, particularly of air defense systems.

Political pressure is also mounting on Merz, though his circle believes the issue can still be contained domestically. German society, sources say, has largely accepted that Kiev was responsible.

However, WSJ notes, the diplomatic consequences would be far easier for Berlin if investigators hadn’t gathered such compelling evidence against Ukraine. 🤣

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
    19·
    4 months ago

    Marxist theory fundamentally focuses on combining education with practical on the ground work, which would include mutual aid. Nobody really cares about being preached to in the abstract, but if they’re getting direct material support then they become much more open to education. This is a pretty decent introduction to doing practical mutual aid https://freight.cargo.site/m/D2275728601487376829209345140067/Mutual-Aid-by-Dean-Spade.pdf

    Incidentally, I was talking with some friends just the other day how local online forums could be used as a direct vehicle for mutual aid. We were talking about using something accessible like Lemmy or even just Slack to connect a neighborhood, and it strikes me that this could facilitate building a practical support network.

    Right now, mutual aid often relies on scattered online groups or flyers. But a dedicated local forum that lets people in the community to get to know each other would help build relationships. And then that could act as a searchable hub for solidarity among people who already know each other. You could have “requests” channel where an elderly neighbor could ask for help with groceries, a “skills-share” thread where people offer tutoring or basic repair services, or an “excess resources” board for giving away food or supplies. It formalizes the “I have/ I need” exchange that already happens informally, making it accessible to the whole community.

    It also becomes a system for education. You could have a pinned post explaining the principles of mutual aid and how it’s solidarity as opposed to charity. It could be used as the platform to coordinate tangible projects like community fridges or tool libraries. The fact that everyone is colocated is key because it means the help is immediate and the relationships built online can be solidified in person, creating a resilient community fabric that can respond to both everyday needs and larger crises.

    In a way, you can use online tools to rebuild the kind of tight-knit village support system that globalized life has eroded, but with the efficiency and reach of modern technology. It turns the internet from a space for abstract global conversation into a practical tool for local care and collective survival.

    • haui
      10·
      4 months ago

      Spot on! Thanks comrade. I’ll save that post. Currently walking the woods. Will give it some serious thought.