• Camarada ForteA
    link
    33 years ago

    How can you know “Supreme Leader” has the same connotation to them as it has to us?

    • The Free PenguinOP
      link
      fedilink
      03 years ago

      IDK, It might be just like how the Japanese call the emperor “Heavenly Superperson” which is just a title that really means squat.

      • Camarada ForteA
        link
        43 years ago

        I’d say it’s not wise to base your conceptions on a society based on those details. Every society is a complex one, and should be treated as such. If you study the history of Korea, you will understand a bit better where they come from, and the development of their society.

        The people of Korea have a history of fighting for their life and dignity against colonizers and imperialists. They were one of the most bombed countries in the world, by the US military. Yet they have managed to achieve their sovereignty, at least half of it, and up to this they they are striving for self-reliance. Take a look at this article, it’s a brief outlook on the Juche philosophy, the guiding philosophical framework of People’s Korea.

        But “Supreme Leader” for the Korean people doesn’t mean obediently serve a monarch as in “absolutism”, it simply means a title of a governing position. For instance, in Brazil, we have an institutional organ called “Supreme Federal Court”, but it’s not supreme at all. The fascist right-wing corporate-military government of Bolsonaro, currently supported by the US, constantly clashes with the supreme court.

        • Camarada ForteA
          link
          23 years ago

          I don’t know. The Western culture has a fetish for this title. “Mr. President”.