However I find myself being disagreed with quite often, mostly for not advocating or cheering violence, “by any means possible” change, or revolutionary tactics. It would seem that I’m not viewed as authentically holding my view unless I advocate extreme, violent, or radical action to accomplish it.

Those seem like two different things to me.

Edit: TO COMMUNISTS, ANARCHISTS, OR ANYONE ELSE CALLING FOR THE OVERTHROW OF SOCIETY

THIS OBVIOUSLY ISN’T MEANT FOR YOU.

  • nephs
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    We’re not advocating violence. Your premise is wrong.

    But we know our adversaries commonly use violence, so we’re aware it exists, and we know we have to prepare for it.

    Are colonialist governments not violent? How do you remove from office a government that commits violence against their people, en masse, to destroy their land with mining operations?

    Concrete example: how would the Congolese vote the French out, when anyone organising peacefully against the French is assassinated?

    The point is not violence. But it would be naive to ignore the violence of our adversaries.