At what point does someone who is mostly reasonable, with a few bad takes become someone not worth listening to? Also, can we separate the art from the artist? For example with Badempanada, he has a couple bad China takes and is kind of toxic online, but he’s well researched, so it really depends whether ML’s I’ve met listen to him. Do you listen to Maoists who are good 95% of the time, but might have a bad Gonzalo take from time to time? Or is there enough agreeable content on the internet that you can just listen to those you agree with? Are certain bad takes just too bad? Will you stop listening to someone after they say something transphobic, even if they’re good the rest of the time like Paul Cockshott? Or if someone is willing to talk with someone like a Larouchite, are they automatically a right deviationist with nothing worthwhile to say, or are the just forming a United front on a specific issue?

  • @redtea
    link
    6
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My other comments should be qualified by this final paragraph ^

    I’m not a fan of giving reactionaries a free hand to say whatever they want on any media platform. I don’t ‘believe in free speech’. My longer comment was more about how I engage with videos, books, articles, etc.

    Edit: clarification