So, I was reading the article on the PSL and I noticed that there “Controversy” section had a different bias compared to the rest of the article. The article on Maupin also has an anti-PSL bias. Can ProleWiki come to a consensus on the PSL rather than having competing biases on the PSL article?

  • Camarada ForteMA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Political parties always have something to be criticized about, and parties make mistakes too. To publicly discuss those mistakes is not bias, it’s trying to reach towards an accurate description of the organization.

    Of course, we also make mistakes too, so if you have something to add about the party which would improve our article, you can either write paragraphs here with sources, and the editors will put there after we verify it or you can also apply for an account on the wiki as well