I am pretty sure that ‘heritage’ makes profit and ‘history’ pays dividends even under actually existing capitalism, otherwise the genealogy services, the historical reenactments, the musea, white literature like the ‘Politically Incorrect Guides’ (just to name one obvious example), European trinkets and so forth, would all be extremely difficult—if at all possible—to find.
So I think that the real problem here is that blatantly racist crap doesn’t sell as well in the current market as neoliberalism’s subtler and more passive–aggressive style of white supremacy, making the white petite‐bourgeoisie resent their corporate competitors even more.
Build nothing, rent everything.
What the hell does that mean?
Money must be made from modern serfs, by useless lords.
Sounds like the history of mediaeval Europe wasn’t all that great, then. (A neofascist could try to patch this up with the excuse that the ‘master race’ was under the ownership of a ‘Jewish’ upper class, but that would only open up more questions. Such is the incoherency of neofascist philosophy.)
Forget national unity, all that matters is the willingness to work like slaves for scraps.
Or, in the case of the Axis, for scraps and the war economy, for which ‘national unity’ (between white gentiles) proved useful in sustaining. Money must be made from modern serfs, by useless lords, in the interest of securing and expanding Fascist capital throughout the continent, as well as anticommunism more generally.
Quality centrism, I presume?
I am pretty sure that ‘heritage’ makes profit and ‘history’ pays dividends even under actually existing capitalism, otherwise the genealogy services, the historical reenactments, the musea, white literature like the ‘Politically Incorrect Guides’ (just to name one obvious example), European trinkets and so forth, would all be extremely difficult—if at all possible—to find.
So I think that the real problem here is that blatantly racist crap doesn’t sell as well in the current market as neoliberalism’s subtler and more passive–aggressive style of white supremacy, making the white petite‐bourgeoisie resent their corporate competitors even more.
What the hell does that mean?
Sounds like the history of mediaeval Europe wasn’t all that great, then. (A neofascist could try to patch this up with the excuse that the ‘master race’ was under the ownership of a ‘Jewish’ upper class, but that would only open up more questions. Such is the incoherency of neofascist philosophy.)
Or, in the case of the Axis, for scraps and the war economy, for which ‘national unity’ (between white gentiles) proved useful in sustaining. Money must be made from modern serfs, by useless lords, in the interest of securing and expanding Fascist capital throughout the continent, as well as anticommunism more generally.
Neofascists are not anticapitalist in any meaningful way.
Centrism may as well be far-right.