• iopq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s insecure, which lets governments like China poison it. They straight up block encrypted DNS

    • knfrmity
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      The EU regularly forces DNS server operators to remove entries or redirect certain domains. It’s super easy to circumvent but most users don’t know that.

        • knfrmity
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          The sites I’m thinking of never had their IPs completely blocked, the DNS entries for the domains were just removed. If you were to switch to a non-EU or self-hosted DNS server you’d get to the site.

          But the domains in question are generally ones the US/EU/NATO propaganda machine has told people are bad, so there’s no outrage when they’re blocked. In many cases there are often cheers.

      • uiiiq@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        As long as there is an oversight and rules, I don’t have a problem with that

        • knfrmity
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          The rules are purposefully vague and interpreted to fit the particular political motives of the day.

    • cum@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s not insecure at all, quite the opposite. Also with DoH, it blends into regular traffic.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        DoH is blocked in China, they cut any TLS connection to a known DNS server (1.1.1.1, 8.8.8.8, 9.9.9.9, etc.)