tværpostet fra: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/3030788

A Reddit post called the picture “red fash”. I admit that it is controversial, since one may read it as mocking peaceful people who are not muscular, but on the other hand I think it is worthwhile to promote physical strength equally with mental strength and class consciousness. I bet that Specnaz, the special forces of USSR, were not formed from physically weak people. Maybe the picture is seen as a struggle between ideas of the “new left” and AES. What are your thoughts?

  • atomkarinca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    i think fascists are as afraid of queer people as they are of socialists, if not more. being queer is praxis.

    • Flamingoaks
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 months ago

      being queer is not praxis and that mountain of gay people in the usa who after getting marriage turns around and started being aggressively transphobic proves it. also thats literally the type of rhetoric that gave us terfs so watch out were u go from there.

        • Flamingoaks
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          yes but being queer is not being trans and now that being some kinds of queer is more socially acceptable some queer people namely gay people have turn very reactionary indeed, proving that being anti capitalist and anti gender is not an essential part of being queer.

          • atomkarinca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            ok, i guess i got it all wrong. i can swear that i heard something along the lines of “queer used to be a slur, but we should take it back” in caelan conrad’s video. i couldn’t find it in the transcript, either i just misremembered or i just can’t find it. the correct term they use is “gender and sexual minorities”. so i guess i shouldn’t have generalized the term queer.

            thanks.

            • bestmiaou
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              i think you misunderstood. if someone is trans, they are queer, but just because someone is queer doesn’t necessarily mean they are trans. some non-trans queer people turned reactionary once they got just enough social acceptance to be comfortable. this can also be seen in some trans people, too.

              • atomkarinca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                ok then my original comment was not incorrect, because i meant to include every gender non-conforming person.

                • bestmiaou
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  ok, now that we have that out of the way, i think you are fundamentally misunderstanding the critique. how is being a reactionary trans person praxis?

                  • atomkarinca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    i had said “being queer is praxis” and i meant all lgbtq+ people by that, i didn’t mean reactionary trans person. being against the cultural, social norms is praxis, to me. it agitates.

                    in some parts of the world, for example where i live, even trans people existing is too much for people.