• porcupine
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    you based your entire opinion here on “whatever the opposite of America is”

    Pure projection. I treat Russia as an ordinary liberal democratic state led by ordinary human people with rational self-interested motives rather than a cartoon villain with an army of mindless robots. My refusal to treat them as fundamentally evil, irrational, or inhuman doesn’t suggest that I think they’re “good”, selfless, or beyond criticism. It means I judge them by the same standards I’d use to judge any similar state with a similar political and economic system in similar circumstances.

    I don’t need to like how America acts to also not like how Russia acts.

    If you’re an American as I am, then your taxes funded the 2014 coup of Ukraine, the ongoing war on Donetsk and Luhansk, sabotaging the Minsk agreements, and prohibiting a negotiated end to the ongoing conflict. You’re not some unbiased neutral observer if you’re pretending to claim “both sides bad” while actively funding and voting to maintain the war and block every local attempt at peace. Absent continuous US intervention for over a decade, this war never happens.

    I don’t care where Russia and Ukraine decide to put lines on a map between them. That’s exclusively up to the people that actually live there, and Euro-Americans like me aren’t entitled to an opinion about it. I care that my government stop using money generated by my community’s labor to murder the people that live there.

    • Skua@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      I treat Russia as an ordinary liberal democratic state led by ordinary human people with rational self-interested motives

      It means I judge them by the same standards I’d use to judge any similar state with a similar political and economic system in similar circumstances.

      Do you? So let’s say the UK decided to funnel weapons in to Ireland to restart the Troubles and then sent tanks in to annex Donegal. Would you be similarly opposed to arming Ireland against a much larger and better-armed neighbour? After all it’d hugely expand the UK’s exclusive economic zone at sea and significantly reduce the length of the border to defend against Ireland, it seems beneficial for Britain. I don’t know about you, but I’d hope someone would back Ireland up in that situation.

      If you’re an American as I am

      I’m not

      the 2014 coup of Ukraine

      Good job Ukraine has had two elections since then huh

      the ongoing war on Donetsk and Luhansk

      It is interesting how so many of Russia’s neighbours have pro-Russian separatist movements that always seem to have Russian backing

      prohibiting a negotiated end to the ongoing conflict

      What leverage do you think Ukraine’s supporters actually have to prevent a peace? They’d stop supplying it weapons? Well you apparently want them to do that anyway. Presumably that’s because you think Ukraine can negotiate peace without being armed enough to fight Russia. In which case these peace-blocking supporters have no leverage with which to block peace.

      Of course they have even less leverage over Russia, which could end this war tomorrow by literally just fucking going home

      You’re not some unbiased neutral observer

      I didn’t claim to be unbiased in the slightest. I am openly pro-Ukraine here. Because I’m generally against countries invading their neighbours and killing hundreds of thousands in order to annex territory, no matter how beneficial it might be to the invader.

      Absent continuous US intervention for over a decade, this war never happens.

      This is literally just American exceptionalism for people that don’t like America. Other countries also do things. Russia has a track record of exactly this kind of thing.