• soumerd_retardataire
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Stupid table :

    “Solution” Israel The west Palestine Arabs
    Israel’s destruction - - - + + +
    Palestine’s destruction + + + - - -
    Two-state solution - + - ?
    A balanced exchange with the west + - (-) + ? +
    A better solution + + + +

    If the west wants to gain Israel, it’s only just to ask for something in exchange after a 1500-years possession of the holy lands(, can’t see how that would be controversial).
    If the arabs(&muslims) want to obtain justice for palestinians&Palestine, Israel as nothing to offer in exchange, but is still a ‘western country’/‘gain for ‘the west’/u(.)s’.
    If we say that Israel will become less westernised with time, then the same thing could be said for a palestinian territory in Louisiana or Mississipi.

    If their eyes/pressure were directed at the west instead of Israel, they could obtain justice without more bloodshed.
    They don’t want to, those who could talk about a two-state solutions(, already disfavorable for them who never received anything in exchange,) and seems to have accepted that it isn’t respected by israelis colons.
    If they’re strong enough to withstand consequences that i don’t know about, then putting pressure on the west through every economical means available(, and progressively), through propaganda, lobbying, …, seems to me necessary(&enough?) in order to obtain justice(, thus, it’s even more certain that they won’t, the status quo doesn’t benefit them, except if they’re waiting for the west’s downfall before making a move).
    I can’t say more than that, this whole situation is unfair( and alternatives/“solutions” seem to exist).