I promise I am not a reactionary, but I am somewhat uneducated on the subject so I might say something offensive accidentally, sorry in advance about that.
So, does gender dysphoria stem from a disconnect between the body and some “gender socialization” function of the brain, which could be solved by getting socialized and treated by everyone as the correct gender from the start, or something that stems from a disconnect between the brain and the actual body parts and hormones, so the transition is needed to alleviate that, or both?
the question here is whenever being trans stems from the social environment, or whenever it is of biological origin. that is a question that is very hard to answer.
And what I’m saying is that I think we can answer this, by asking trans people about their experience of transness. There’s clearly a biological component to some gender feelings, because if there weren’t you wouldn’t have so many trans people talking about how much better they feel on hormones. But also, some gender feelings are clearly social, which is why so many trans people really, truly enjoy performing their chosen gender. And I just don’t see what more science can tell us here. That those of us who feel better on hormones aren’t imagining it, I guess? I suppose it would be nice to have proof of that that cis people can’t argue with, but they still will, because transphobia doesn’t come from a place of logic.
I guess, to sum up, I’m not in principle opposed to science being done to try to study transness, but I am also extremely wary of bad science being used to try to get rid of us, and anything trying to make a hard distinction between transness being social or biological seems quite dangerous to me.
you are by no means wrong, but there is a lack of empirical research in this field. that is all that i want to say really. i absolutely agree that it is both, but we aren’t some idiots who just go off what sounds right, we do science to know what is right. and that is really hard to do. and that means i won’t just say it is that, if i don’t have or partially lack empirical prove that it actually is.
Empirical research in this field is just asking trans people. That’s all there is to it, you cannot measure how much gender dysphoria somebody feels any other way. We are talking about phenomena that are entirely internal, and exclusively experienced by us, how we feel about them and how we express them is the absolute only way to research them, and is what you’ll find in any paper on reduction of dysphoric symptoms that holds up to scientific standards, whether you’re looking into studies that show how social context affects trans wellbeing or how medical treatment affects trans wellbeing. It’s always “ok, let’s make a questionaire and ask trans people what works”. All approaches to understand us while at the same time ignoring what we have to say have failed to yield results that have held upt to critical review, just ask all the idiots who tried to explain our existence away as a “paraphilia”. Cis people need to come to grips with the terms that is us and us alone who are the authorities on trans issues and how to treat us. There is no alternative to this and this is simply not negotiable, not after decades of ignorance and outright hostility and demonstrable, human rights violating mistreatment from the psychiatric establishment. We demand the exclusive say on how to live our lifes, because you cissies have no understanding of this. None. I’m sorry to say this, but you people don’t get it and that you don’t get it has killed way too many of us, we won’t have that any longer.
Sorry to harp on this, I know you’re not making a big or strong claim, so it probably feels like I’m being extra nitpicky. Nevertheless, I’m going to push back a bit on what it seems to me that you’re saying.
When you say “we aren’t some idiots who just go off what sounds right, we do science to know what is right”, I take that to mean that you want better evidence than what I’ve provided before you are willing to say with certainty that transness has both biological and social aspects. I wonder, then, what evidence you would accept. What kind of studies need to be done for you to agree that transness can be both biological and social, in different measures for different people? Please really think about this. If trans people saying “hormones make me feel different, and better” isn’t good enough evidence that sometimes some aspects of transness are biological, what is? If trans people saying “I love having short/long hair and wearing suits/dresses” isn’t strong enough evidence that sometimes some aspects of transness are social, what is?
Here’s the reason I’m harping on this: we live in an extremely transphobic society and that transphobia often manifests in people implying, or even outright stating, that trans people are wrong about ourselves. Any science done to try to understand transness needs to start from a place of believing what trans people say about ourselves, and because we’re not there yet as a society, I’m deeply wary of any so-called “science” that gets done about us.
deleted by creator
Not in my experience, no. Because when I started testosterone, I planned to just stay on long enough for my voice to drop. I didn’t want to have to do weekly injections for the rest of my life, so I fully planned to go off T after a few months. After a little while I decided I’d stay on T at least until I had a hysterectomy so that I could avoid dealing with a period ever again. But after my hysterectomy, I did indeed go off T, for approximately 4 months. I wanted to give it a good go, so I stayed off until I hadn’t had any hot flashes for several weeks, at which point I was quite sure that my endocrine system had stabilized. I felt awful. Just, so fucking bad. It’s hard to explain how much worse life was without T. I wish I still had access to the hexbear account I had at that point so I could link you some of my posts from that time. It affected everything, my mood, my energy levels, my appetite, my orgasms. Everything was just muted, I was constantly on the verge of tears, I couldn’t stop clenching my jaw. And you know what? I recognized this feeling. It felt like I was back in middle school. It felt the same as the first time my system flooded with estrogen.
So sure, we could do a study where we take trans people off their hormones and see how miserable they are. Sure, we could do that, and I think it would be pretty dang revealing, but I don’t think we should, because I’d never wish that misery on anyone else.
how do you propose to get such a study past IRB? there was a kid who had his genitals destroyed by a botched circumcision and he was very unsuccessfully raised as a girl. I don’t think you’re going to find people willing to do double blind placebo controlled hormone injections on kids at random or do literally anything involving feral children, and if you do find such a person please kill them.
edit: some letters
well maybe because there is other ways to answer that question? such as analyzing the brains structure and searching for the diferences between trans and cis people? studys of the psychological state of trans people before and after transition? children aren’t even that usefull here
These brain scans that transmedicalists harp on about simply show that there is no difference between a trans woman and a cis woman on an organic level, but not in the way that they are imagining. There is no “female brain”, neurological differences between genders are not absolutes, they are clusters. There are traits more common in women than men, but no two women have the same arrangements of these traits and all of these are found in men as well. It’s all just one big, messy spectrum. Trans people fall on the end of the sprectrum that more closely matches our gender identity, not our assigned gender at birth, that’s nice i guess, but it’s also really, really meaningless and has done nothing to explain an ethiology of transness or to improve trans healthcare. Like, it has literally done zero in that regard, whereas just asking trans people “are you happy with HRT?” produces pretty clear evidence that yes, almost all of us are, gender affirming care is clinically demonstrable to be fucking effective. Deal with it.
Buddy, you are (unintentionally, I’m sure) repeating some fairly transphobic talking points. How would you feel about a study analyzing the brain structure of gay people to try and search for differences between gay and straight people? Does that seem like a good study to you? Also, your response to silent_water is doing exactly what I hoped you weren’t doing when I wrote my last comment to you, namely, you’re saying that a trans person telling you to your face that hormones make them feel better, so there must be some biological component to transness sometimes might be, what? Mistaken? Lying? Or maybe you just think that my (and silent_water’s) physical response to hormones is somehow mediated through culture? That is the non-transphobic reading of what you’ve said, but if that’s what you believe you’re going to have to bring forth some evidence that someone’s physical response to a change of hormones could be solely cultural. Because I do not see any possibility that a change to someone’s endocrine balance would feel different based purely on social factors.
i just noticed i got a little emotional here, and i kinda doubled down after being proven wrong. and i might have said some really stupid things (that i should know are untrue) that also straight up conflict with my own experience on hrt… and i’m sorry. i really shouldn’t have said most to all of what i said, and i do realize that i sounded quite stupid here. i will try to be more reasonable in the future, but i said that to myself before. but well, here we are.
mentions of people who where also in this “discussion”: @JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net @Orannis62@hexbear.net @silent_water@hexbear.net
@AcidSmiley@hexbear.net just saw your comment sorry for wasting your (and everyone else’s) time
I don’t think it’s a waste of time, there’s a lot of good, insightful replies ITT and maybe it helps some people understand. Lack of understanding is what’s hurting us the most.
be that as it may, the transmed stuff is still brain poison and it’s worth learning to identify it. appreciate the apology though.
no it isn’t. this is a question trans people answer for themselves daily. every trans person has a slightly different answer but that doesn’t negate the fact that there is an individual answer for each person. there’s no need to mystify this.
how can you tell why you are trans? you can now that you are trans, but honestly the claim that you know whenever the structure of your brain, or the way you were socialised are more importend in it, is pretty new to me.
I know what my body feels like when I forget to take my estradiol shot. I know what it felt like before I started taking it in the first place.
And capital-S Science has a long enough history of completely ignoring us or trying to make us fit into little cis-centric boxes that I don’t care what it says about us and our origin, to the degree that Science is even looking into that for a reason besides eugenics.
because when my T levels spike above a certain level, I know before I’ve even gotten a blood test to confirm. I go straight into depression, suicidality, etc… and yes, I’ve confirmed with blood tests that I’m correct. E makes me happy but I can’t live with T in my system - it’s literally either me or the T. I knew I was trans long before I had my T suppressed and started E but it was hormone therapy that confirmed it for me beyond a shadow of a doubt. even if there were a magical brain scan that would show with 100% accuracy whether or not I were trans, I wouldn’t take it - I already know I’m trans. the only purpose of such a test is to gatekeep people - especially non-binary people - out of the trans community. I do not give an iota of a fuck why someone calls themselves trans. if they tell me they are, they are. no other criteria matters in the slightest.
strongly recommend backing away from the transmed shit, it’s just a parasitic worm intended for your brain.