In light of user Wisconcom’s community Hoxhaism (created using an alternate account named Ouisconkom), and the anti-China/anti-Mao sectarianism that permeates the rhetoric of the community. It has come to our attention that some members of the community are unhappy with this sort of content being allowed.

In the past, we’ve removed other Ultra-leftists, such as Patriotic Socialists, for their sectarianism. And some of the admins feel this might be a time to do that again.

Lemmygrad’s success depends on transparency and communication between the user base and the admins, so we would like the Lemmygrad community to tell us how they feel about this possible issue.

  • @Ouisconkom
    -10•2 years ago

    This is an extremly dishonest assessment. You completely remove any context from what I am saying in order to crudely make me falsely seem like some sort of fanatical and single-minded Ultra-left.

    The reason why I said:

    “I am willing to discuss this further, but not in this particular context.”

    Is not because I am close-minded about that person’s arguments, but simply because this is not the place to do it. I am willing to consider their views, in fact, I have already had a respectful discussion with somebody who left a critique of a post I made in the Hoxhaist community. If they were to, say, comment on one of the posts in my community, or somewhere else, I would be perfectly willing to reply to them with a counter-argument in a respectful manner, as I have already done recently.

    “Right now, I haven’t seen any willingness to admit his mistakes or recognize that the way he engages with others is extremely toxic.”

    I have done just that. I admited that I falsely resorted to petty-name calling, that I was false to say that Xi Jinping was a millionaire, and that I lacked good sources for that claim, and that I was overall being disrespectful to others. I have since retracted all my criticisms of, for example, Mao Zedong to the Hoxhaist community itself - as I understand that people outside that community are going to dislike what I have to say.

    • @Munrock
      10•2 years ago

      I was false to say that Xi Jinping was a millionaire, and that I lacked good sources for that claim

      It’s not just that you lacked good sources, it’s that you cited terrible ones. You actually looked at ‘caknowledge.com/xi-jinping-net-worth’ and decided to cite it. Why? You’re clearly not an idiot, so you can’t have thought it was a reliable source.