In light of user Wisconcom’s community Hoxhaism (created using an alternate account named Ouisconkom), and the anti-China/anti-Mao sectarianism that permeates the rhetoric of the community. It has come to our attention that some members of the community are unhappy with this sort of content being allowed.

In the past, we’ve removed other Ultra-leftists, such as Patriotic Socialists, for their sectarianism. And some of the admins feel this might be a time to do that again.

Lemmygrad’s success depends on transparency and communication between the user base and the admins, so we would like the Lemmygrad community to tell us how they feel about this possible issue.

  • @Samubai
    link
    29
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I propose we call the Hoxhaism instance a pilot program and review its effects in three to four months time. If it becomes a source of toxicity, hostility, and internal drama, we scrap it. If not, wonderful.

    I am of the opinion that Ouisconkom is self-aware and restrained enough to be trusted. At least I know they are a communist. I disagree with their stances on things, but honestly, I’ve been busy reading Mao, Stalin, Lenin. I would be glad to keep the Hoxhaism instance as long as it’s a place where productive ideas are put forth strictly about Hoxhaism and its tenets.

    I think it’s important to have a space for ideas that challenge our own, but it’s a different thing to have a platform that poisons the well.

    • @Ouisconkom
      link
      11
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That is acceptable. Our community is largely focused on teaching people about Hoxhaism and further applying the ideology to the modern day. It is in our best interest to ensure it contributes to Lemmygrad.