• Samubai
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Everything I said is based on empirical information, not what the State Department said.

    Okay. Provide the sources. Link how it is that China is not socialist or communist. Second, address the other points which you have conveniently neglected. You can’t just cherry-pick and think to get away with addressing half the points brought up.

    Lastly, why are you even on lemmygrad? if you hate the user base so much, why submit yourself to this? Most people here are not Hoxhaists. Get over it. Like, you haven’t even explained things well, or made a convincing argument for yourself. It’s all naysaying. Aka a waste of time. You don’t even like Mao. Petty bourgeois? Lenin was petty bourgeois, and Marx! Don’t even get me started on Engles, or Guevara or Castro!

    Get outta here with that nonsense.

    • Wisconcom
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      You need not look further then the constitution, the fundamental law, of the People’s Republic of China itself. During the 10th National People’s Congress, held in 2004, it was decided that private (bourgeois) property should be both allowed and enforced by the “Communist” party. For example, it says, I quote:

      legally obtained private property of the citizens shall not be violated

      Private ownership of the means of production is legally enforced by the Communist Party, how Socialist.

      Do you want sources for all the billionaires? let me present them:

      https://www.rt.com/business/553679-shenzhen-china-billionaires-number/

      https://news.cgtn.com/news/2021-04-06/China-has-more-billionaires-than-ever-Forbes-ZffqU7Mmbe/index.html

      https://news.cgtn.com/news/3d3d774d774d544d30457a6333566d54/index.html

      https://news.cgtn.com/news/2020-10-20/Stock-market-boom-new-listings-mint-China-billionaires-at-record-pace-UKyamY6s9i/index.html

      As to your claim that I am “cherry-picking”, that is false. As I have already said, people such as Guo Wengui are very rare. Geo Wengui commited very major crimes to get such as treatment. However, I must once again ask you something; Why does China have billionaires in the first place? Billionaires are not useful for economic growth, they are greedy, selfish, and care about exploiting their labourers. China could, with ease, achive the same, if not more, economic growth with a centrally planned economy. They do not need billionaires, let alone have atleast 100 billionaires in major government posts.

      I am on Lemmygrad, particularly this part of Lemmygrad, because I thought I could get an intellectually meaningful discussion with fellow Marxists. I do not hate Dengists (which clearly seems to be an omnipresent ideology here), one of the reasons why I was so invested in this discussion was to help Dengists and other revisionists understand their Capitalistic and Anti-Marxist theory. Of course, now that I see how deeply Revisionist this community is, I have realised that this is rather futile - You Revisionists really think that Billionaires is Socialism, abusing Proletarians is Socialist in character, and selling guns to Anti-Communist governments to murder Communists is Spreading the Revolution. You Dengists use so many complex mental gymnastics to defend a clearly Capitalist state, I was not expecting this, I confess.

      • 洩矢(もりや) 諏訪子(すわこ)
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        我不知道你为什么分不清生产资料与个人财产,像你这样的想法在大跃进时期也出现过,锅碗瓢盆都被收归公有最后落得了什么下场?中国有亿万富翁,但腾讯拿出一年的利润支持乡村振兴战略,拼多多免费帮助落后地区销售产品,这些是资本家良心发现的作为还是被中共要求的作为?我再问你,请问在中国没有开放私营经济的时候中国是否比现在更好?我是中国人,我更喜欢现在的中国