• Kaffe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’ll have to be more specific, all revolutionary theory is “books on how to destroy capitalism”.

    • Cyber GhostOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      A cookbook on how to do it that is applicable to modern times and accounts for our current tech and for the fact that nukes exist which render tactics meaningless

      • Catradora-Stalinism☭
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        nah it just makes “permanent revolution” useless. Internal revolution is viable, people will not nuke their own cities.

        • Cyber GhostOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          What do you mean by “permanent revolution”?

          • Catradora-Stalinism☭
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            oh its just nonsense. Basically normal wars aren’t viable in the long run, even thought they weren’t really ever viable in the first place. You can’t just invade a country to rip apart their bourgeoisie, or at least the major countries.

            We really just need to build up enough communists in the imperial core, while our comrades in the global south cut the beast’s tentacles.

            • QueerCommie
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I thought that said testicles. Either way, we need to destroy the US’ ability to fuck the global south.

      • ReadFanon
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wouldn’t overstate the importance of nukes tbh.

        We have only seen the use of nukes in a military capacity once in our lifetimes, in the cowardly act of the Yanks against an enemy which was entirely on the ropes at the time they were deployed.

        They mostly serve as a deterrent and, to some degree, for power projection over non-nuclear states.

        I am not in the business of making forecasts but I struggle to foresee a situation where a nuclear power would nuke its own citizens in a revolutionary moment.