It’s my, general, understanding that most people connect to the Internet through mobile apps.
If this is the case, then why have apps such as Remmel, Lemmur and jerboa taken a back seat?
IMHO, it would be a mistake to market Lemmy without these mobile apps functioning properly.
I have forked the three aforementioned mobile apps here and will try to ‘drum up’ support from developers wherever I can find them.
Please, if you don’t feel comfortable talking to me about this here, then send me a private message. Thank you.
Yes. My general philosophy is that, if it can be done in the browser, then it shouldn’t need an app. Leave mobile apps to the cases where the browser can’t get the job done.
Using Lemmy on a smart phone with a browser should work fine since the site is built to be responsive. However, having a native Lemmy application for Android and iOS could provide opportunities for further feature development that isn’t included with the browser version. That is why I believe it is a good idea to keep these apps going.
What is the point of adding exclusive features to the mobile application? What sort of features should these be? Purely cosmetic?
Two examples:
However, I personally use the website by now and rely on email notifications.
“Progressive Web Apps” with “Add to Home Screen” is the tech make this happen I think?
Notifications are supported.
Sharing intents can be registered via web share target, which I think is supported by chromium but not yet by Firefox.
I have it like that but notifications doesn’t seem to be supported or, at least, with the application closed.
Also the sound and light seem to be specific of the whole browser applications as far as I could test right know.
I stand corrected on the utility of app exclusive features. I never considered it, but I suppose I rather like how I don’t get notifications through lemmur. Though I understand how that’s a hassle for others who want them.