Apparently this was an actual discourse going around.

  • QueerCommie
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    True, as such it’s only natural for it to be more economical rather than less to buy local. Only a fossil fuel addicted world can find outsourcing and externalizing more “efficient” and profitable.

    • ComradeSalad
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I was referring mostly to how those plants require absurd and absolutely unsustainable amounts of water and nutrients. They shouldn’t even be grown locally, they should not be grown at all or made extraordinary expensive to reflect their cost.

      • QueerCommie
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That too, for many places with “nutrient poor” soil it’s unnatural and unhealthy to have great amounts of nitrogen, thus fertilizer ends up being bad overall, and only non-native plants are grown further harming native ecology. Don’t grow water loving plants in a dry place, nor graze cows where forest is better and ruminants haven’t evolved with the soil. In addition it’s absurd that great fleets of honey bees are driven across the country for almonds, when honey bees aren’t even native anyway. Then the media starts crying they’re gonna go extinct but don’t give a shit about native pollinators.