Someone has not been studying US history from before 1950 it seems.

I recommand reading “War is a Racket” by Smedly Butler

It’s in the public domain, here is an online version: https://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/warisaracket.html

And I found an audio book for those that prefer that: https://librivox.org/search?title=War+Is+a+Racket&author=Butler&reader=&keywords=&genre_id=0&status=all&project_type=either&recorded_language=&sort_order=catalog_date&search_page=1&search_form=advanced

Relevant quote:

“I spent 33 years and four months in active military service and during that period I spent most of my time as a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism.

I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914.
I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in.
I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street.
I helped purify Nicaragua for the International Banking House of Brown Brothers in 1902-1912.
I brought light to the Dominican Republic for the American sugar interests in 1916.
I helped make Honduras right for the American fruit companies in 1903.
In China in 1927 I helped see to it that Standard Oil went on its way unmolested.

Looking back on it, I might have given Al Capone a few hints.
The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents.”

― Smedley D. Butler, War is a Racket

1. US puppet lead Haiti

2. The US puppet is so hated and incompetent that unrest is rising, risking a potential revolution that might actually bring some real democracy (or at least make it harder for the US to exploit Haiti)

3. the US have their own puppet assassinated using columbian mercenaries led by people linked to US drug enforcement authorities and try to hide them in the nearby embassy to taiwan

4. for some reason once the suspiciously high number of element linking the assassins to the US start being know, the media lose interest in the story

5. a new US puppet replace the previous one

6. the people also hate the new puppet and unrest is rising again, with people daring to ask for a leader that might maybe serve them instead of a foreign government

7. The US dog in charge of Haiti asks its masters to send military assistance to crush the unrest <= we are here

To say nothing about the famous source [citation needed] and their clear anti communist bias. /s

More seriously, XKCD did a simple but good comics about some issues with certain Wikipedia sources: https://xkcd.com/978/

It’s of course not unique to wikipedia, Adrian Zenz for example once wrote a big report to the German government with in theory lots of “sources” mentionned at the bottom of every page.

the issue of course was that if you actually checked the source, half the time it was various publications that themselves used studies or reports by Adrian Zenz himself as their source, so the guy was actually using himself as a source, but with just a few intermediaries from western media it gave the illusion of a large number of different sources with the same opinion.

And the other half were themselves sourcing from well knonw totally not biased sources like Radio Free Asia, the National Endowment for Democracy, or ASPI.

My understanding is that there were some anti China protesters near the chinese embassy (probably some HK separatists or similar), and they tried to force their way inside the Embassy and were repealed by the embassy staff, but the BBC then shamelessly told that it was the opposite and that the embassy staf were the one who tried to drag a protester inside the embassy (https://meet.google.com/xjp-rfhr-sun?authuser=0&hs=122) to “disappear them”. Which is ridiculous hen you realise that just watching their video clearl show the protesters as the ones on the offensive in the first place.

Seriously, the official declaration from the UK are literally opposite to what you can see with your eyes in the video of the event:

“Shortly before 4pm a small group of men came out of the building and a man was dragged into the consulate grounds and assaulted,” the statement said."

Here is the picture they used showing the man supposedly being dragged: https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/0E96/production/_127243730_ab007ba2-be91-4e18-9589-93e48eab6dea.jpg.webp

But then watch their video (in the same article I linked), and you will see some person taking down one of the protesters banners, which the BBC declare as an attack on the protesters, but then immediatly every protesters run toward the embassy gates and try to force their way in, it’s only then that the embassy staff reacted -to literally prevent the protesters to enter the embassy, not the opposite.

This is impressive but it won’t beat the precedent of various anarchists trying to argue with the “On Authority Bot” on twitter and losing without even realizing they were talking to a bot.

If he kept a 100% track record, people might starting to suspect Chen to be a God in disguise /s

There is actually ONE bad take from Chen, it’s an older tweet about China intervention in Vietnam.

But it’s more like the exception that prove the rule.

A Comically Large Spoon^tm

But to be fair, this one seems too small to have been used to eat all the Grain in Ukraine, so it was probably one of the lesser prototypes they made.

The Onion also has a parody video celebrating the first woman dictator as a victory for women rights, the way the libs are celbrating this mussolini loving fascist election made me think about it.

Berlusconi might have maybe qualified to be described as a fascist, but then, he was so comically corrupt that he was probably too byusy to enrich himseldf to do more fascist things …

Ok doing some research, I found reference to this NATO naval exercices in june (so not so long ago) near the Island of Gotland, close to where the leaks happenned, so this would match what I read elsewere : https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_196240.htm

Of course the leaks happenned long after the exercice ended, but if we go by the example of the 2015 failed sabotage, then they might have simply used the exercices as a cover to approach the pipelines and put there unmaned devices that they activated later (after all a leak when they were still there would have been too obvious).

Funny thing is that a few day agos there was another NATO navak exercice, this one near the coast Portugal, about new " unmanned systems for maritime operations" : https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_207293.htm

In addition to that, it seems that there were apparrently a small flotilla of NATO military ships doing “exercices” of new tech for “underwater interventions” (you know, innocent stuff like disabling sea mines … or sabotaging a pipeline). The last positions known of those ships was only a few dozen kilometers from the places with the leaks (something like 50 km from the NS1 leaks, and 60 km from the NS2 leak, or the reverse, not sure from memory), and I also read someone saying that the ships stopped transmitting their positions soon after that (maybe not unusual when doing military exercices, but if the case it would be the perfect cover), but i have yet to see a source for that, so take it will a little salt.

Adrian Zenz, a radical christan theologist who said he was “led by God” in a mission to destroy China.

He is behind a very large majority of the “studies” and “reports” about the Uyghurs, despite having a awful methodology, quoting as sources publications that themselves used him as their own source, and misquoting multiple time numbers by a factor of 10 (like 8.7% in his actual source becoming “more than 80%” in one of his “studies”).

He is also a member of the “Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation” (itself a US funded organisation with a history of fascism), doesn’t speak Chinese nor the Uyghur language, and by his own account he only went to China once.

In 2007.

As a tourist.

Here is an article with more details on his awful and bad methodology if not outright lies: https://thegrayzone.com/2019/12/21/china-detaining-millions-uyghurs-problems-claims-us-ngo-researcher/

going by yearly statistics, today alone american cops shoudl have killed an average of 2 or 3 human beings, and close to 30 dogs.

“What the Fuck are they doing with my Spoon !?”

Probably not, he had no reason to use them, especially when already winning, while the rebels knew that any use (real or not) of chemical weapons would give the US justifications for sanctions of other interventions, and every instance of supposed use of chemical weapons happenned in areas held by the rebels, or were “revealed” by the rebels-and-NATO-aligned white helmets, or similar suscpiscious contexts.

Bringing Chaos at the door of the US potential rivals or ennemies, as usual

“Defies physics” is a good way to smell bullshit stories based on purely theoricall technobabble that has yet to be tested

Love the last panel lol

Apparrently Russian soldiers are too stupids to just drink tap water ?

It’s not as if they had bombed every building in sight including water treatment plants US style, heck the russian had the occasoin to destroy power plants to cut power to a large proportion of the country and they didn’t do it.