• Belly_Beanis [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is the more incompetent version of The Matrix. In the films, humans blotted out the sun in order to cut AI off from their main power source. But IRL, they’re blotting out the sun in order to allocate more resources to LLMs.

    • supdawg813 [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Once every year we’ll reproduce a small part of the extinction event that took out the dinosaurs by dumping a literal ton of microscopic glitter into the atmosphere. Our planet will build a resistance to climate change. pepe-silvia

      There is absolutely no way this can backfire before we’ve rammed it in as a more reasonable option than simply not sacrificing our planet to the altar of increasing rates of profit. porky-happy

    • DogThatWentGorp [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      Eliminate sunshine and create a booming artificial sunshine market*

      Diversifying into sun blocking tech, UV lamps/grow operations and VR like I’m a knockoff, capitalist version of the robots from the Matrix for those sweet gains come 2035 😎😎😎😎.

      [chat this period of history blows so much ass]

    • Lovely_sombrero [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 months ago

      Good news, we invented Snowpiercer from the short novel “Don’t do Snowpiercer” that was based on a book called Snowpiercer.

      IIRC, when a volcano erupted in the 1990s (Pinatubo), temperatures dropped by ~0.1C on average, but crop yields of corn dropped by ~10%. Plants really need sunlight.

    • micnd90 [he/him,any]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Bike to work if you can/take public transit, don’t eat meat, don’t use AI, and yell at your local politicians.

      IT’S NOT THAT HARD PEOPLE

      • LeninWeave [none/use name, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        4 months ago

        Bike to work if you can/take public transit, don’t eat meat, don’t use AI

        All good, all only solutions if everyone does them (and even then, only partial). This is not an individual problem, there are no individual solutions.

        and yell at your local politicians.

        “Yell”. Haha. Yes. illegal-to-say

        (The only actual solution is proletarian revolution.)

      • Frogmanfromlake [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        People get really defensive when this kind of stuff is said. I hear people in my country say that it’s the global north causing this issue and nothing they can do will really change that, which is true but then they proceed to throw their trash in freshwater lakes and you can’t blame the global north on that.

        • BakerBagel@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          4 months ago

          My father threw his trash in Lake Erie, same as his father before him, and his father before him. His father? Ran out of Scotland for throwing trash in Loch Lamond

  • TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    In a vacuum I’m glad that people are trying to come up with creative ideas to combat climate change since you never know what might work.

    The issue is that in the US this is often being done in place of and not in addition to stuff we know needs to be done like restructuring cities around public transportation, encouraging people to reduce or eliminate meat consumption, etc.

    The amount of times I’ve seen people try and justify the massive energy and water consumption LLM are using because the “AI” will solve the issue for us is way too many. Like even if it was an actual AI being worked on it’s very likely going to just tell us to do things we already knew we should’ve been doing and that’s even if you can artificially create sentience which I feel like is a a big if.

      • Carl [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 months ago

        I wouldn’t say “never”. We’ve seen in recent years that reducing emissions in China can reduce the reflectivity of the planet and increase temperature everywhere in the short term, so I think it’s well within reason to say that “blotting out the sun” can work.

        The problem is that once you start doing something like this you’re locked into doing it forever, and we don’t have anywhere near the level of understanding of the knock on effects of this type of geoengineering.

        • micnd90 [he/him,any]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          4 months ago

          They are promising $200M annual revenue by 2030 and potential IPO for sprinkling dust into the stratosphere FOR PROFIT. Who’s gonna pay them? If this is a somewhat feasible solution, people would’ve talked about it years prior in academia and at IPCC meetings. Any serious discussion about mitigating climate change boils down to yelling at politicians to put solar panel, wind turbines and better public transport as the only feasible solution on the global scale. Not feeding cows seaweed to reduce methane emissions, not community garden, not paper straw, and certainly not blotting out the sun. This is NFT level scam.

          • Carl [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            4 months ago

            Oh I’m not saying that this isn’t a scam, you’re right about that. But in theory I could see a government doing this and it working in a technical sense.

        • FnordPrefect [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah, this is straight Bond-villain shit:

          eco-porky Attention people of Earth. We are going to block out the Sun! No, not in a sinister way; to lower the temperature. And if you don’t pay us…TWO HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS every year in perpetuity we’ll cook the planet!

      • vovchik_ilich [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Blotting out the sun already has been proven to work. Maritime trade in 2020 implemented heavy regulations on Sulphur Dioxide emissions that essentially overnight reduced said emissions by 80%.

        Accidentally, it turns out Sulphur Dioxide was carrying out reverse greenhouse effect and global temperatures are rising much faster than before as a consequence.

        This research should NOT be in the hands of private capital, but burying our heads in the sand regarding climate science and geoengineering is a horrible idea.

      • TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Oh yeah this specific plan and the way they’re going about it is garbage. Was speaking more generally about solutions.