I guess it is a consequence of the Reddit migration where the habit is just keeping the old community name. But having C/Politics being US only on Lemmy.world, an instance that aims to be international (hence the name), seems weird to me.

Would have been cool to give up this assumption that everything is related to US by default when moving away from Reddit. I mean, even the canadian political news of Lemmy.ca is CanadaPolitics.

    • whenigrowup356@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Are the admins deleting global content or something? If not, wouldn’t correcting it just be more people from other countries posting their own political news?

      • Ab_intra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s part of the rules:

        Must be articles relevant to US political news. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed.

    • Squander@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      11 months ago

      It should change its name to US Leftist Politics. The mod u/YoBuckStopsHere is responsible for 80 percent of the posts and its comes with their bias. Their mods also delete posts and dont enforce the TOS. If you want to have any educated discussion about politics, thats not the place. Its a very close minded, hostile crowd over there.

  • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Lemmy.world is full of US-specific things. It’s quite bizarre that US is probably the only major country that doesn’t have its own instance. I’ve already noted it. And predicted it a month ago, but that didn’t go anywhere.

        • dottedgreenline@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Segue: Is there a way to enlarge these images on jerboa? They are teeny, and all touching them in any way does is hide/close the comment.

          Edit: I see on Connect they actually work as links and can be opened in a new tab.

          • CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            11 months ago

            Not a fucked up mess…. Yet!

            But we’re working on it! Here at the CIA our goal is to give you the freedom every red blooded American enjoys! Like the freedom to never go to the doctor because of the cost! Being shot at school because religious nut jobs think Jesus wants it that way! Work your self to death to stay just below the poverty line! Watch as the social safety net your forefathers literally died for gets eroded away as you too embrace Christo-facism!

            We can’t WAIT to bring this opportunity to your shores! Work with us in serving the billionaire working class and enjoy all the benefits above!

    • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      You could just sign up for Kbin. It already lets you block instances from it’s front end. I can’t speak to the diversity of something like kbin.social in regards to US vs elsewhere though. Personally, I think a language filter would be nice. For example instances (or even community/magazine level) could have a default language property and you’d be allowed to filter on that. It’d be a shame to block an entire instance just because it’s in a different country.

      In regards to “US-specific” instances, I think the issue is more that folks in the US see less incentive to shoulder those costs if they can’t sell it. The charitable bodies willing to do this or that I’d even trust to do it are few and far between. All of this is just a theory though. I have nothing but my gut feeling to back it up. So take it with a grain of salt.

      • Norgur@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Personally, I think a language filter would be nice. For example instances (or even community/magazine level) could have a default language property and you’d be allowed to filter on that.

        Wouldn’t help with the US-defaultism-problem though. English is

        a) spoken in Europe as well (I mean… that’s where it’s from)
        b) lingua franca for all the world

        The fact that most of the world can’t really filter English discussions but English native speakers can filter almost everyone else’s just by language alone is part of the problem. Besides, you can already filter which languages you want to see in your profile settings.

        • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          I don’t have a problem with default-US on principle. I don’t want to filter out anything other than what I can’t read.

          And don’t make assumptions. I can’t filter based on language. I really think most people are just failing this whole fediverse concept. I’m not even on lemmy.world let alone even using Lemmy.

          I can’t filter based on language as far as I can tell on Kbin. I can already block communities/magazines, users, and entire domains for that matter. Kbin already “solved” this problem. My issue here is that it’s not a problem. If an instance is general purpose and a community doesn’t break any of its rules, I see no reason to be upset that someone took a community name before someone else. I’m not about to get behind the censorship bandwagon of majority rules (or maybe not even majority, just loud) taking over communities because they feel they can use the name in a better way.

      • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Blocking an instance doesn’t help if everything is piled on Lemmy.world… Unless I’d want to block this.

        I mean… As it is, lemmy.world is shouldering all the cost, so it can’t be impossible.

      • PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I’d prefer a language translator that translates everything to your default language, that way we can all communicate.

      • dingus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Beehaw is a locked down walled garden instance that doesn’t seem to actually want to be everyone’s go to. That’s fine, but it doesn’t mean it makes sense for most people to join it.

        Midwest.social is only specific to a small region of the US.

        I don’t think every country necessarily needs their own instance though.

        • steltek@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Beehaw is a locked down walled garden instance

          That’s maybe a little unkind. If you had been working to nurture a small community (vernacular definition), you too would be super concerned about a sudden influx from Reddit. Assimilation would be impossible.

        • negativeyoda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Midwest.social is only specific to a small region of the US

          Um. Have you ever been to the midwest? If you’re in Kansas and your dog runs away you’ll still see it for 3 days

        • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I disagree with the concept that there’s a better place for anything. If my account is here, I will create a community/magazine here. I’m not going to segregate myself simply because of my location. You can argue that an instance should suggest naming conventions for localized topics. But it’s up to the instance to require that. There’s no real rules between instances at all. So I find the discussion that a community doesn’t belong in a general purpose instance. If it doesn’t conflict with the intent of the instance and the instance has no naming convention, it’s first come, first serve.

          Creating generic rules to apply to other instances aside from the protocol is simply not what the fediverse is about.

          Edit to add: also, there’s no default instance for a country either. Sure those that you mentioned exist, but there’s no rule saying Germans need to put German specific things in feddit.de.

          • MaxVerstappen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            11 months ago

            There’s gonna be a lot of culture shock from authoritarians throughout the fediverse it would seem. Some people don’t know what to do with a little freedom.

            • Buelldozer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              People are generally good with having their own freedom, where they get outraged is when they discover that other people have freedom. Obviously this situation can’t be allowed so rules need to be made, and enforced, so those other people have to conform.

          • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            11 months ago

            I don’t know why some people are treating my complains like I’m some sort of Judge Dredd that wants to shoot everybody who makes a community I don’t like.

            I’m saying, be reasonable. I wouldn’t be making a community on .world about some random 4th league football club or a hike trail in my country, I’d use an instance more suited for it. If you can’t make a new community there, ping an admin to make it for you. It’s not a big deal, and better for everybody: locals can find it more easily, and the others won’t be bothered by it by default.

            The reverse is also stupid, creating general-purpose comms on country-specific instances. Once instance blocking becomes an option, nobody will find them.

            For real, how is it that every bloody country can make its own instance, but only the US can’t? Doesn’t it strike you just a bit weird? I’m no more interested what’s going on in Oregon than in Frankfurt.

            • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              As far as I know, you can only create communities on your own instance. I don’t like the idea of telling people that need to create accounts elsewhere becsuse their community isn’t welcome.

              A general purpose instance is general purpose. As long as it doesn’t break any rules, it should be welcomed.

              And segregating the fediverse is literally not what it’s about. There shouldn’t be forced segregation.

              Instances shouldn’t be localized unless that’s its purpose. If there was a feddit.us that was general purpose, I’d be fine if someone from the UK created a football community first.

              There’s no such thing as a better place for something in the fediverse. There’s only not acceptable places. And general purpose has a very low bar for acceptable.

              I feel like most folks don’t get the idea behind the fediverse and the multi-instance concept.

              • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                11 months ago

                You just fail to see anyone else’s point besides yours. I already addressed your objections, and you’re unable to address mine, so I won’t be repeating myself.

                • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  Your argument is “be reasonable” and then some subjective feeling about what you feel is personally reasonable. Your reason isn’t objective. I addressed this in literally every comment in some fashion. Your feelings aren’t an argument.

                  Edit: especially since you never addressed the technical limitations I mentioned in any way shape or fashion. That’s a much bigger hurdle than your opinions about what fits in general purpose.

          • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Interesting point. I’ve seen that some country instances have a !europe community. And I wouldn’t be against a full instance either. It could be useful.

    • Compadre de Ogum
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      I am sure the fact they don’t use they ccTLD “.us” (not even the government) is part of that mentality. The internet is kind of built to be usanian by default

    • itadakimasu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      As someone living in the United States, I personally do not want to be on a US only instance. US is a burning pile of poop right now. Please save us

  • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    Is it US politics simply because there are far, far more Americans on there than from any other country (especially English-speaking)… or is it US politics because other threads are blocked and/or deleted?

    There’s a rather large distinction there.

    We love you Canada, but let’s be real here, there are almost 10x more Americans than there are Canadians, so naturally there are going to be more political stories posted about the country with the much larger population. If non-US posts are deleted, on the other hand, then that’s messed up.

    • Flicsmo@rammy.site
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      11 months ago

      The latter. Rule 2 of the community is “Must be articles relevant to US political news.”

    • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s most likely because r/politics on Reddit was that way, and people tend to make subreddit clones on Lemmy.

      • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Right, which I think is the root problem. Not all the subreddit names were great - I would have liked to have seen us try to do better - but I think many were just trying to make the correlation between communities and subreddits as obvious as possible.

        • livus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          I see it as kind of a first generation migrant thing. Some people are bringing as much of their reddit culture with them as they can and trying to make it the same.

          But we will grow and change and create our own stuff.

    • Kabe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      IIRC, over half of Reddit’s traffic was US-based. I’d be interested to see if the same is true for lemmy.world.

      • livus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think it was about 47% but it was a relative majority, or a plurality as Americans call it.

        • Falmarri@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          or a plurality as Americans call it.

          Those silly Americans, using words in line with their definitions

          • livus@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Huh? Everyone uses words in line with their definitions. But New Zealand English and American English have differences.

            “Plurality” isn’t used in NZ English, but since there are a lot of Americans here I added it as a courtesy to make my meaning clearer.

            Coming from a minority country this is just something we do.

            If I were commenting about, say, what we normally call “lollies”, on a predominantly British website I would add “sweets” and on a predominantly American website I would add “candy”.

          • livus@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Yeah less than half, but still a bigger share than any other single culture, so that’s how they ended up being the dominant group on most subs.

          • Ryumast3r@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            When r/politics was created, and for a vast majority of reddits existence, Americans made up a majority of reddit, and for a long time made up a supermajority.

            Of course there was a US-Bias.

    • Izzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m sure they would delete non-US political news if it is part of their rules.

  • NAS89@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    11 months ago

    Politics was my first blocked community on Lemmy. Then every other US politics community that has sprung up. They’re either echo chambers or flame wars and it’s irritating to use the internet as an escapism and run into arguments daily.

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      and run into arguments daily.

      The same arguments daily! Even as a politically active American it’s utterly boring and unnecessary. Yes, we get it, you hate $PoliticalTribe and feel that you need to show everyone how awful they are. Yes, fine, they are truly terrible. Now lets talk about something else for a minute.

  • Izzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    US people are way too blind to the existence of the outside world. I’m sure they have no idea that Lemmy.World is not in the US. I’m not really sure what could be done about this other than making a new more broad politics community. I’d prefer the generic named community to be the one that is the most broad and then if you wanted only US politics to make a more specific community such as !USPolitics@lemmy.world.

    I don’t think it would be out of bounds for instance admins to force such change as they see fit if it makes enough sense.

    • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      We all have preferences, but unless you convince the admins to be onboard for moderating communities so that they all follow a specific rule and can’t be localized unless it’s part of the name, I’d say let it go. I am not comfortable with the idea of allowing majority rules to simply take over a community simply because they think they have better use for the name.

    • MaxVerstappen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      Or you know, !worldpolitics could be a thing and you could stop telling other people how to think and behave.

      • Izzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m not telling people how to think and behave. That is a weird thing to say in my opinion. I’m sharing my thoughts and feeling. I don’t mind if people disagree or have counter points to make. That is the nature of discussion.

        • QHC@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          You clearly have an agenda in asking the question. There’s no problem with that, but pretending you don’t is… weird.

          • Izzy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            11 months ago

            I clearly stated my opinion in which I don’t even feel that strongly about. It’s just some thoughts that came to mind. I’m not trying to sneakily conspire to influence things the way I want them to be. If stating how I feel is enough to accomplish this then it must be a pretty good idea.

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      Unless non-American politics is being deleted then it is just who the more prolific posters are.

        • snooggums@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          That is weird!

          Note: didn’t notice that clicking the post heading would take me there until I checked after your reply and I’m still getting my head around the syntax for finding new communities.

  • QubaXR@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    11 months ago

    I agree. on any other server it would already be questionable, but lemmy.world suggests international appeal. The default news should be world news, with each country heading their own channel.

  • InternetTubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Really wish fediverse didn’t also port the “first one to win the race to a keyword gets to have it” from reddit!

    Although if you went world politics in a single subreddit, I can only imagine people would just fight about what really deserved to be in their imaginary “left/right” divisions.

    • PutangInaMo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      It is going to take some getting used to, but the honest answer is to run your own instance and host your version on that. Gonna get real weird though.

  • outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’ll speak to the moderators, if we should unlock it for international politics, but right now it’s US moderators and I barely know italy politics or EU politics but am Interested in adding them.

    • Ab_intra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      Then they should get more europeans, why should there only be mods from the US lol.

      • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s so reductive, it’s absurd. It’s free labor to moderate these things.

        Who is they? And where do these people magically spring from? If lemmy has a low content issue, surely there would be a low amount of people willing to moderate as well.

        • Ab_intra@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          11 months ago

          You really think Lemmy has a content issue lol?

          And of course free labor don’t grow on trees but I’m pretty sure there are many that would be willing.

        • Ab_intra@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s the same issue. Not all politics is american. It should be uspolitics instead.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I suppose it’s about moderation. It would be a bad idea to talk about European or south American politics if there’s only US moderation. Política is a very touchy matter and needs a very good and diverse moderation team.

    • Netto Hikari@social.fossware.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      No, it’s about Americans always thinking they come first. I was told so many times that “rEdDiT Is aN AmErIcAn wEbSiTe”… But now, they can’t pull that shit any more.

      I say rename the communities.

      • hypelightfly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        In this case they did come first though! They registered the /c/politics community first.

        But really they should change the display name to US Politics.

        • Netto Hikari@social.fossware.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          It doesn’t matter. The name is misleading. It’s a generic name and therefore should cover all politics. I’ve seen people claiming “ohh, but it’s only US mods”… Yes. I run a whole instance. Americans are welcome there, too and I’m from Germany. So?

      • Meldroc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I wonder how hard it would be for Lemmy devs to put in an aliasing feature, say so when a user goes to c/politics, it’ll automatically switch to c/uspolitics or something like that… That would make this easier.

        • Netto Hikari@social.fossware.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Probably not hard. But that doesn’t solve the problem that a generic term is used for something US only on a platform that isn’t US first.

          • Meldroc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            The point of suggesting this was to make the process of renaming the communities a little easier. Users do have to be led around by the nose, don’t they?

            • Netto Hikari@social.fossware.space
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              If you’re talking about me here, I understood why you were suggesting it. But to me, that’s not the problem of c/politics in this case. They wouldn’t want to rename, if it was possible, because “AmErIcA fIrSt”.

    • pineapplefriedrice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Which is not an issue at all. Plenty of medium-sized subs have a geographically wide spanning mod team. For a large sub like that it’s a non-issue.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 months ago

    Lemmy.world, an instance that aims to be international (hence the name), seems weird to me.

    I never got the impression that this instance specifically aimed to be international. It always felt like the aim was to replace Reddit in whatever way that manifests itself. I never got the impression that every community needed to be equally inclusive of content from all countries.

    As for !politics@lemmy.world, I think part of the problem is that changing the rule would result in very little change since

    So it may be better to just keep the US users isolate where they are and create a new sub that would just be less dominated by those users.

    • hyorvenn@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      From the Lemmy.world description:

      “A generic Lemmy server for everyone to use. The World’s Internet Frontpage Lemmy.world is a general-purpose Lemmy instance of various topics, for the entire world to use.”

      And the logo is an earth. It does not forbid any community restricted to one specific country (neither should it, it’s perfectly normal), but it sure isn’t specifically tied to the US. I think a fair comparison would be if c/politics was China content only, that would looks weird too (even more so because of the language but well, surely you get my point).

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I just think you’re reaching to say the “world” branding has anything to do with the philosophy of the website. I think it’s cool branding and synergy with the mastodon instance. Other than that, it is no more worldly than Reddit was.

        With that said, it’s no more weird that c/politics is specific to US politics than r/politics was.

  • ch1cken@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    There’s also @WorldNews which literally allows any world news article, except for US related ones which are banned… in a worldnews community, absolutely ridiculous. It also directly goes against their rule 3 which is “no discrimination”.

    Fortunately there’s other communities which are just as active, if not more, without the same bias.

    • Kichae@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      It also directly goes against their rule 3 which is “no discrimination”.

      No, in a space that’s dominated by Americans, and where the base politics forum is US-only, this isn’t discrimination. It’s carving out a space for everyone else.

      You don’t get to take over every space your eyes fucking see. You’re not Mufasa.

      • Buelldozer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        You don’t get to take over every space your eyes fucking see.

        American politics in a nutshell.

      • ch1cken@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        Ok, but what you described is literally discrimination against americans. Just because they’re american, doesn’t mean its not discrimination.

        If you changed the word “US” to a middle eastern country, im sure that’d receive a lot of backlash, but since you mentioned the US its acceptable. /s

        It’s carving out a space for everyone else.

        when you place bias in a news community, that community is corrupt, its not a credible source for news.

        • DarraignTheSane@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Then you’d agree that c/politics should allow any political news and discussion from around the world and not just U.S. politics, correct?

          • ch1cken@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Yeah i agree, or politics should at least rename to American Politics to clarify, and lemmy.ca’s one Canadian Politics, etc.

        • Thassodar@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          By your logic bathrooms are discriminatory as well. Each instance can set its own rules, if you don’t like the rule then block that instance. Problem solved.

        • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s negative discrimination - when you try to limit the overwhelming power of one group over all others. That’s the reason why lots of governments have laws that mandate e.g. the minimum number of female employees etc. It is to mantain some balance.

          All kinds of world news is dominated by USA relations anyway. People don’t need that and to read about every school shooting and presidential fart as well.

          Another topic, but related: I mod at !playstation@lemmy.world. Since basically all the ps-related news is about the PS5, I’m asking people to post news and stuff specific to PS5 into its own community. Am I discriminating against PS5 users? Perhaps, but what’s the point of having two comms with 99% copypasted content, with anything else being drowned?

        • Compadre de Ogum
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Do you believe in “reverse racism” and “heterophobia” as well?

        • Kichae@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Ok, but what you described is literally discrimination against americans. Just because they’re american, doesn’t mean its not discrimination.

          Oh noes! Sumeting isn’t abowt me! Dis must be wut discwiminashun is! Help! Help! I’m bean oppressed!

          QQ all day long, I guess.

          If you changed the word “US” to a middle eastern country, im sure that’d receive a lot of backlash, but since you mentioned the US its acceptable. /s

          Your convenient and bad-faith lack of understanding of power imbalances doesn’t make you not a giant crybaby. Go home. Y’all seem to love your isolationist imperial hellscape, just stay there and keep your nose out of what other people are doing. The rest of us don’t want you around, anyway.

          • ch1cken@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            11 months ago

            Oh noes! Sumeting isn’t abowt me! Dis must be wut discwiminashun is! Help! Help! I’m bean oppressed!

            For the record i’m not american, that doesn’t mean i support racism against people who are. And honestly, its hard to take the opinion of someone who speaks this way:

            doesn’t make you not a giant crybaby. Go home

            especially when most others on this thread are speaking civilly.

            Go home. Y’all seem to love your isolationist imperial hellscape, just stay there and keep your nose out of what other people are doing. The rest of us don’t want you around, anyway.

            Thanks for confirming my point about blatant discrimination. Baffles me how people only think that racism applies to certain countries and that if you’re racist to say, americans, its acceptable.

    • hyorvenn@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I suppose it’s also a remnant of the reddit community. I agree it sounds weird, but it was also the result of the limitations of Reddit. I don’t think you could easily create a tag for each country, and even then, it wasn’t user friendly to filter them based on your preferences. So because of this, and because r/politics was already US only to begin with, it was just the easy solution to get every other news content.

    • bloubz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It’s not forbidding US related content, it’s preventing post about internal US affairs that we don’t care about

  • Elle@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I can see where you’re coming from, however…Did you message the mods of /c/politics & ask if they might consider changing their display name to more clearly indicate their US focus? It’s not ideal, but the display name is what’s shown when searching for communities or seeing posts from them in local/all feeds, so it at least helps in that regard.

    At the same time, as other comments point out, there are a number of other politics communities with a broader focus across other instances, so unlike Reddit, we can have a /c/politics in any number of other instances with different rules and without a US focus. In a weird way, it’s almost better that the /c/politics here is US focused, as it encourages folks to post & discuss general politics (including the US) in other smaller instances.

    Although, ultimately, this would come down to whether the admins would prefer such simply named communities to have a wider focus as their name suggests instead of a narrow focus as is happening here, but I haven’t gotten the sense that the admins necessarily want to get that directly involved in community naming & creation tbh.

    • jungle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think you’re missing the last part of the fully qualified name: “.world”

      • Elle@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s a difference of interpretation imo. Others here understandably read it as meaning or suggesting an international focus, but others still (such as myself) read it as meaning a general focus (which is itself reinforced by the front page’s own description).

        Personally I do agree with OP & others here in preferring non-specific communities like politics or law to be open to international politics & law, but I’m not in a position to make that call. Also as noted, I don’t think the admins are interested in intervening in communities so long as their moderators aren’t abusing their positions nor abandoning their accounts & letting communities go unmoderated.