I think this should be prioritized in order to help with the insane growth and associated costs of Rexxit.

It may not make sense for 100% of proceeds to go to Lemmy devs, but something like 70/30 or 60/40 split (in favor of the instance host) would be a great idea to help us support the scaling effort.

Edit: I guess I’ll take my L. This seems to be a pretty unpopular take, and I understand why. We’ll see where things end up in a few months when these suckers start getting actually big

  • Artemis@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    To expand on the idea:

    Ideally this would incentivize devs who are hesitant about the cost of hosting to spin up a server, bringing us more instance options and helping to further decentralize the platform.

    Right now fedi relies on donations, and it seems to be working, but at some point the growth could outpace the donations leading to large instances shutting down. Rewards on Reddit are dumb as shit cause they feed an amoral corporation, but on Lemmy they would directly support those who are lending their time, money, and expertise to the growth of the fediverse.

    • greyson@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I get the pushback here cause reddit rewards have always been super cringe… but I mean this isn’t the worst idea

    • wiki_me@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right now fedi relies on donations, and it seems to be working,

      Maybe for other social media platforms, for lemmy not so much (iirc they currently make about 7k a month, which isn’t really good for two full time developers).

  • Charlie Fish@eventfrontier.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Feels like this would just be adding on a centralized feature to a system designed to be decentralized. If anything, it should be based on a decentralized system like Bitcoin or something.

  • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Absolutely not. I hate that pay to win bullshit. We shouldn’t be pushing for monetization that encourages or creates any sort of “premium user experience”. That’s corporate bullshit. Paying for the service should improve the service for everyone, not just for yourself or for some comment you want to feel superior to everyone else by “paid upvoting”.

    • Artemis@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Then limit rewards to posts. And I specifically did not mention a subscription service for that reason.