• 2ugly2live@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    23 hours ago

    In your example, their solution is absolutely being a murderer. They didn’t pull the trigger, but they condemned those people to death. They know that refusing is killing those people, that their refusal is the cause for those peoples deaths. I’m not saying that I don’t think Gaza is important, or that it’s not worth fighting for, but I extend that same importance to my countrymen as well. I think the woman who may need an abortion is important, even if I never get one. I think that my neighbor’s kids should have a save school, and not be laden I’m debt, even thought I don’t plan to have children.

    I cannot stop what’s going on in Gaza. It’s a horrible, terribly bitter pill to swallow, but it is the truth. However, I’m not going to set everyone else on fire so we can all burn together in solidarity. Too many other people’s lives are at stake. And I’m not saying their lives are more important than those in Gaza, I’m saying they’re just as important. Kill one person, or kill everyone. I would rather save someone than no one.

    • basmati@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Exactly, you think being a murderer is okay.

      That is the core philosophical difference.

      You are completely okay with killing innocent people. These people are not, normal people are not.

      This difference cannot be reconciled. These people will never think the way you do, and thank every God ever imagined for that, as someone needs to be the moral party if only as an example of how normalized and justified pure evil is.

      • 2ugly2live@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        20 hours ago

        That’s not at all what I said, and I think you know that. Wanting to help someone is not the same as wanting to kill someone else. My vote doesn’t save Gaza, because there is unfortunately no option, but my vote could still help someone. Not voting, or throwing it away, literally doesn’t help anyone.

        I hope you find peace with your indecision and your cowardice should the rest of the country not be able to make up for your inactivity. But I’m sure those suffering in Gaza will feel better knowing that someone in Texas is bleeding out in the parking lot. That’ll show 'em.

      • Scirocco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Fucking ridiculous.

        A vote for anyone OTHER than Harris directly results in MORE Gazan suffering.

        Trump will not restrain Israel. On the contrary, he will encourage them to ‘end it’ and achieve “peace” by ACTUALLY genociding all remaining Palestine resistance.

        • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          restrain Israel

          Are you really so deluded to beleive all of Bidens play acting about how he was seeking peace all this time? He used 0% of his levers to make peace happen and 100% of his levers to encourage Israels murder spree.

        • basmati@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          There already has been no restraint from Biden. Genocide is genocide, and Harris supports genocide.

          I’m not voting for genocide, there is no moral argument to do so.