A Russian kamikaze drone on Wednesday flew into NATO air space and detonated near a Romanian village, Ukrainian news reports said, but official Bucharest said the fact of the strike wasn’t confirmed and that they would check.

Ukrainian social media video recorded in the river port city of Izmail, opposite Plaura, showed an orange flash lighting up the night horizon and a booming blast on the Romanian side of the river. Flames and smoke reaching hundreds of meters into the sky were visible following the explosion. A Russian kamikaze drone strike against Izmail had been in progress at the time.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        This whole war was 100% avoidable and you think that escalating it would make it end faster… dude…

        • macniel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          avoidable how? Putin wants his old territories, like crimea, back. How is his land grab 100% avoidable?

          • MarxMadness
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 months ago

            Crimea had been in Russian hands for nearly a decade when Russia invaded.

            • Zabjam@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              Nearly a decade since they took it from Ukraine. So the solution to avoid war is handing Russia all territory they want? Where does that stop? At the polish border? At the German border? French border? At the Atlantic?

              • MarxMadness
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                The point here is that you don’t even know the basic facts you’re talking about. Russia didn’t want Crimea in 2022; they already had it.

                It’s also laughable – genuinely embarrassing – to suggest Russia is trying to conquer all of Europe. Pure fantasy plucked straight out of thin air.

                As for deterrence, that’s already been accomplished, especially if you believe the casualty numbers Ukranian propaganda puts out. Clearly there is a cost to war. The goal now is to end the fighting on as favorable of terms as you can realistically get.

                • Zabjam@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Well yeah, they had it in 2022 because they wanted it in 2014 when they took it from the sovereign country of Ukraine.

                  And I am not suggesting anything, I was asking where they will stop after conquering Crimea and currently trying to conquer Ukraine. So, where will they stop - if at all?

                  I think different parties have different goals in this war. And in general I think the goal of a sovereign country, to stay sovereign within their own borders is not an illegitimate goal.

                  • MarxMadness
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Well yeah, they had it

                    You were wrong and are doubling down instead of acknowledging that maybe there are some gaps in your knowledge.

                    And I am not suggesting anything

                    And you’re trying to walk back ridiculous fear mongering (where will they stop??? the Atlantic???) instead of acknowledging that Russia isn’t going to start invading the whole planet for no reason.

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            2 months ago

            It was all about Ukraine joining nato. Had there been a promise that Ukraine would not join nato, this war would not have happened. The people in charge knew this and decided to do seek Ukraine joining nato anyways, why would they do this if they knew it would cause war?

            • pingveno@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              2 months ago

              Bullshit. Crimea was invaded mere days after the change of power in 2014, far before anyone of note was seriously talking about Ukraine joining NATO. Support for separatists elsewhere soon followed. It was about Russia exerting a “sphere of influence” that it felt entitled to. The Russian leadership can’t seem to get that countries are joining NATO because of Russian imperialism, past and present.

              • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                Russia took over Crimea due to the overthrow of the Pro russian government with a pro west government, a thing they also found as direct provocation. Why did Russia invade Georgia?

                • pingveno@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  They could have waited or tried to make a deal with the new government. They did neither and immediately invaded without making an attempt at an arrangement.

                  Why did Russia invade Georgia?

                  Are you trying to get me to say NATO? Because that conflict far predates NATO involvement.

                  • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Because that conflict far predates NATO involvement.

                    That is not true, in the 2008 Bucarest summit in April they discussed how they wanted Ukraine and Georgia to join nato, and then in August Russia invaded Georgia to stop this and put in a Russia puppet government. Why would Nato indicate they wanted to have Ukraine join Nato when they knew it was a serious provocation? Before this war no one gave a shit about Ukraine, and most americans probably couldnt point to it on the map, why was it so important to have it join nato if it risked a war?

        • legion02@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          Nato entering would basically be an overwhelming force against Russia. It’s going to end real quick after that.

          • MarxMadness
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            2 months ago

            That would kill millions at minimum and likely result in nuclear war. It’s utterly psychopathic to cheerlead this and totally detached from the horrors you’re wishcasting. Disgusting.

          • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            Okay so you want a hot war between Russia and NATO and you think that would be less violent?

            Where are you getting your information from?

            • macniel@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              2 months ago

              Putin would know fully well that M.A.D. isnt worth it over the russo-ukranian war.

              • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Are you aware that he has threatened this multiple times? Who do you think Ukraine is more imporant to Russia (its neighbor) or the US (a country on the other side of the world where a good portion of people couldnt point to it on a map)?

                • macniel@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Yeah because only USA is part of NATO (yeah disregard all EU member states of NATO why don’t you) and only on a flat map is it on the other side of the world. It’s literally across the Bering strait.

                  • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    The US is the main driver of NATO by far. The far reaches of russia are right next to the far reaches of the US, but Ukraine is on the other side of the planet. Why would Russia have less incentive than the US to lose?

                  • MarxMadness
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    It’s literally across the Bering strait.

                    Damn you really can’t point out Ukraine on a map lmao