return2ozma@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 17 days agoWhat's an idea you have that should be an actual thing?message-squaremessage-square264fedilinkarrow-up1186arrow-down115file-text
arrow-up1171arrow-down1message-squareWhat's an idea you have that should be an actual thing?return2ozma@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 17 days agomessage-square264fedilinkfile-text
Tourist cities should have hotel rooms by the hour that are actually clean when you just want to take a nap.
minus-squarelaughterlaughter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·16 days agoWhy not make sure that both are comfortable? The issue is not the reclining seat. The issue is the space in between the seats. So, the issue is the airlines, not the passengers.
minus-squarestoy@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·16 days agoSure, but increasing the seat size will increase ticket cost.
minus-squarelaughterlaughter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·15 days agoWell, that’s a different argument. The original argument was “permanent seat reclining” and you replied: Nope, the recline function make almost zero comfort change for the occupant, but for the person behind it has huge impact. You didn’t mention cost until now.
Why not make sure that both are comfortable? The issue is not the reclining seat. The issue is the space in between the seats. So, the issue is the airlines, not the passengers.
Sure, but increasing the seat size will increase ticket cost.
Well, that’s a different argument. The original argument was “permanent seat reclining” and you replied:
You didn’t mention cost until now.