CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 5 months agoWhich adaptation do you think has surpassed its source material in quality?message-squaremessage-square144fedilinkarrow-up1100arrow-down16
arrow-up194arrow-down1message-squareWhich adaptation do you think has surpassed its source material in quality?CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 5 months agomessage-square144fedilink
minus-squareAlphaOmega@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 months agoIt’s a common Mandela Effect. Interview with A vampire instead of interview with THE vampire. Read the book 6 times plus, saw original movie a few times and wrote a book report on it. For me it’s always been interview with A vampire
minus-squareVelvetStorm@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 months agoOmg, wtf is even going on! I’ve read all her books like 3 or 4 times each and saw the movie like 5+ times and never knew that.
minus-squareAngryCommieKender@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 months agoIt’s so common Google autocorrect gave me “interview with a vampire” as an option, and not “interview with the vampire” after only typing the string "interview "
It’s a common Mandela Effect. Interview with A vampire instead of interview with THE vampire.
Read the book 6 times plus, saw original movie a few times and wrote a book report on it. For me it’s always been interview with A vampire
Omg, wtf is even going on! I’ve read all her books like 3 or 4 times each and saw the movie like 5+ times and never knew that.
It’s so common Google autocorrect gave me “interview with a vampire” as an option, and not “interview with the vampire” after only typing the string "interview "