This is half a decade old news, but I only found this out myself after it accidentally came up in conversation at the DMV. The worker would not have informed me if it hadn’t come into conversation. Every DMV photo in the United States is being used for AI facial recognition, and nobody has talked about it for years. This is especially concerning given that citizens are recently being required to update their ID to a “Real ID,” which means more people than ever before are giving away the rights to their own face.

The biggest problem with privacy issues is that people talk about it for a while, but more often than not nothing ever happens to fix the problem, it simply gets forgotten. For example, in the next few years Copilot will simply become a part of people’s lives, and people will slowly stop talking about the privacy implications. What can we even do to fight the privacy practices of giants?

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    What can we even do to fight the privacy practices of giants?

    Not much unless you’re a billionaire or a politician.

          • helenslunch@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’m not sure it is. Feels like a waste of money. People don’t care. Politicians don’t care. In fact they greatly benefit from the erosion of privacy.

              • helenslunch@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 month ago

                ACLU has done a lot of good

                I don’t doubt it, but at the end of the day it’s a drop in the bucket vs. the wide variety of increasingly exploitative platforms that people continue to use.

                The government doesn’t even need surveillance, they just demand it from corporations with data that users knowingly and willingly volunteer to them, to the extent that you can’t even participate in society without subjecting yourself to those same invasive and exploitative platforms.

                their lawyers have fought to not give up Signal users’ information

                What information? How can they give information they don’t have?

          • helenslunch@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            28 days ago

            They’re literally lobbiests

            Huh?

            have a track record of forcing the government to make great changes

            And yet here we are…constantly sliding downhill, regardless…

            • delirious_owl@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              28 days ago

              The EFF and ACLU employ a number of people, and some of those people exist to lobby the government to not make dumb laws.

              Politicians don’t understand technology, so they need lobbiests to explain to them how legislation could be bad for people from a technical perspective

              When you fund the EFF, you get lobbiests on your behalf going to legislators to fix broken legislation. And lobbyists going to legislators to write good legislation to protect our rights.

    • fiercekitten@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Or you’re willing to immolate a billionaire or a politician, as long as it’s a sincerely held religious belief.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t think Billionaires even get an exception. It actually might be worse for them in some ways.