https://x.com/wentisung/status/1793895169957507228
Dude works for the Australian National University and the Atlantic Council and can’t scrape up any better dirt than “textbook girl wear pants now 😭”
https://x.com/wentisung/status/1793895169957507228
Dude works for the Australian National University and the Atlantic Council and can’t scrape up any better dirt than “textbook girl wear pants now 😭”
Interesting that the reactionary is recuperating “gender self-expression” to describe girls wearing feminized clothes but not the normalized (in the 20th-21st century) crossdressing. Instead that’s described as communistic and sexless. Which is also interesting. What depths the Sinophobic reactionary brainpan has!
Sinophobes malding about the Vocel police.
It’s interesting to compare with Westoid lib blob’s reaction to Japanese schools allowing girls to choose to wear pants, which is generally heralded as a progressive measure.
I think the reactionary is using sex in the other sense. Because they want to sex children. And since boys and girls are basically indistinguishable, this is done through hair and clothing. Call this socially-coerced sexing “gender expression” in order to court cultural feminists.
a liberated woman is a horny and sexy woman
Commodified sex objects to be sold on the market
truly a society free of repression