• Justice
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      6 months ago

      If this is true, and I’ll just take your word for the moment, then simple solution is simultaneously strip the patent and all variants of it going forward

      • invalidusernamelol [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        6 months ago

        That does seem to be what’s being proposed in the original post. The last line isn’t “stop this indefinitely” it’s “stop this until the patents are made public”

        • GalaxyBrain [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          Okay, that’s reasonable IF you’re implementing a solution at the same time. Make it a legally standard part and have the manufacturers pay the patent holder for all I care until then. The stopgap measure shouldn’t be ‘keep letting people lose fingers until we settle this’.

          • invalidusernamelol [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            Oh yeah, the caveat is that if you’re gonna run this play you have to actually work to get that law passed. You can’t just use the fact that a safety regulation would create a monopoly to not do anything

            • GalaxyBrain [they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              6 months ago

              It wouldn’t even bother me if they just like, made them cut a government contract style deal where they’d make and develop it under subsidy until they get a law passed. That’s some wonk shit, but I’m trying to consider a doable thing under lib world to keep fingers on hands until it’s settled. Cause in the end, does anyone operating these machines give a flying fuck who’s getting the money for what’s keeping their hands attached to.their arms more than that it’s fucking there in the first place? Instal tthe damn sensors and then argue about it.

      • ZWQbpkzl [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        And strip an innovator of their intellectual property? Earnestly this is probably legally/politically impossible for even the federal government to do.

        • Justice
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          I mean politically Biden is doing an extremely unpopular war/genocide. Stripping patents from shitty companies is far more popular. And yeah the government can essentially do anything it wants on that front. SCOTUS will sometimes strike things down as being unconstitutional, but if you go off that logic then basically every law can be debate-broed into being unconstitutional. Which is one of many problems with SCOTUS allocating itself more power… different discussion though. But yes congress can absolutely strip a patent with minimal effort.